226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33550343)
1. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Changing scanning angles on improving finish line trueness of the full crown preparation].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Feb; 58(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 36746449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scanning Accuracy of 10 Intraoral Scanners for Single-crown and Three-unit Fixed Denture Preparations: An In Vitro Study.
Zhang XY; Cao Y; Hu ZW; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun YC
Chin J Dent Res; 2022 Sep; 25(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 36102891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative analysis of 3D data accuracy of single tooth and full dental arch captured by different intraoral and laboratory digital impression systems].
Ryakhovskiy AN; Kostyukova VV
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2016; 95(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 27636766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of substrate adjacent to the scan region on the trueness of four intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
Elter B; Tak Ö
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104729. PubMed ID: 37778497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of finish line location and saliva contamination on the accuracy of crown finish line scanning.
An H; Mickesh GJ; Cho D; Sorensen JA
J Prosthodont; 2024 Jan; 33(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 36719010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study.
Vandeweghe S; Vervack V; Dierens M; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):648-653. PubMed ID: 27150731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of the effects of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression using two intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
Geramipanah F; Sadighpour L; Payaminia L
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2023 Dec; 9(6):983-992. PubMed ID: 37786371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of adjacent teeth on the accuracy of intraoral scanning systems for class II inlay preparation.
Kim JH; Son SA; Lee H; Yoo YJ; Hong SJ; Park JK
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):826-832. PubMed ID: 34608739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative analysis of intraoral scanners accuracy using 3D software: an in vivo study.
Pellitteri F; Albertini P; Vogrig A; Spedicato GA; Siciliani G; Lombardo L
Prog Orthod; 2022 Jul; 23(1):21. PubMed ID: 35781850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
