159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33551396)
1. Diagnostic Performance of High-Resolution Intravascular Ultrasound for Abnormal Post-Stent Findings After Stent Implantation - A Comparison Study Between High-Resolution Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography.
Ando H; Nakano Y; Sawada H; Ohashi H; Takashima H; Suzuki A; Sakurai S; Amano T
Circ J; 2021 May; 85(6):883-890. PubMed ID: 33551396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.
Akl E; Pinilla-Echeverri N; Garcia-Garcia HM; Mehta SR; Dan K; Kuku KO; Courtney BK; Sheth T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):686-698. PubMed ID: 34792273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural history of stent edge dissection, tissue protrusion and incomplete stent apposition detectable only on optical coherence tomography after stent implantation – preliminary observation – .
Kume T; Okura H; Miyamoto Y; Yamada R; Saito K; Tamada T; Koyama T; Neishi Y; Hayashida A; Kawamoto T; Yoshida K
Circ J; 2012; 76(3):698-703. PubMed ID: 22251751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for detecting small degrees of in-stent neointima after stent implantation.
Suzuki Y; Ikeno F; Koizumi T; Tio F; Yeung AC; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Fearon WF
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19463295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.
Kim SJ; Lee H; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Jang IK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ability of optical coherence tomography to monitor percutaneous coronary intervention: detailed comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Kawamori H; Shite J; Shinke T; Otake H; Sawada T; Kato H; Miyoshi N; Yoshino N; Kozuki A; Hariki H; Inoue T; Hirata K
J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 22(11):541-5. PubMed ID: 21041851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of intravascular ultrasonic imaging with versus without incomplete stent apposition at follow-up after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Qian J; Zhang F; Wu H; Fan B; Ge L; Ge J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Feb; 24(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 17703294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-modality imaging for stent edge assessment.
Ann SH; Lim KH; De Jin C; Shin ES
Heart Vessels; 2015 Mar; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 24481539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
