These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33551607)
1. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using ProTaper Next, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary systems: An Polineni S; Damaraju B; Bolla N; Sunil C; Krishna NV; Sreeha K J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):314-318. PubMed ID: 33551607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study. Garlapati R; Venigalla BS; Patil JD; Raju R; Rammohan C J Conserv Dent; 2013 Jul; 16(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 23956529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of various endodontic instrumentation systems on the amount of apically extruded bacteria - An Sahni G; Garg N; Chhabra A; Negi S; Gupta S; Chhabra V J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):270-274. PubMed ID: 33551598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Apical extrusion of Enterococcus faecalis using three different rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study. Taneja S; Kumari M; Barua M; Dudeja C; Malik M Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 25961619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using rotary ProTaper, K3XF, twisted and hand K-file system: An ex vivo study. Ghogre P; Chourasia HR; Agarwal M; Singh MP; Gurav S; Ghogre R Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 26481889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files. Topçuoğlu G; Topçuoğlu HS; Akpek F Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 26538300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An Kalra P; Rao A; Suman E; Shenoy R; Suprabha BS J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Feb; 9(2):e254-e258. PubMed ID: 28210445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of two engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Er K; Sümer Z; Akpinar KE Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):871-6. PubMed ID: 16343113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of apical bacterial extrusion following root canal instrumentation using different endodontic file systems: An Vankayala B; Anantula K; Saladi H; Gudugunta L; Basavarajaiah JM; Yadav SS J Conserv Dent; 2019; 22(6):559-563. PubMed ID: 33088065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria following use of Two Engine-driven Instrumentation Techniques: An in vitro Study. Mohammed N; Noushad MC; Balan B; Dhanesh N; Jayasheelan N; Revankar VD J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Nov; 17(11):939-942. PubMed ID: 27965505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying the extruded bacteria following use of two rotary instrumentation systems. Mohammadi Z; Khademi A Iran Endod J; 2007; 2(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 24298285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of Apical Bacterial Extrusion in Manual, ProTaper Rotary, and One Shape Rotary Instrumentation Techniques. Mittal R; Singla MG; Garg A; Dhawan A J Endod; 2015 Dec; 41(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 26472680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apical Extrusion of Intracanal Bacteria with Single File and Multifile Rotary Instrumentation Systems. Saberi E; Zahedani SS; Ebrahimipour S J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017; 7(5):292-296. PubMed ID: 29026702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of apically extruded bacteria associated with different nickel-titanium systems. Türker SA; Uzunoğlu E; Aslan MH J Endod; 2015 Jun; 41(6):953-5. PubMed ID: 25799537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Anterior Teeth using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An Asif A; Jeevanandan G; Govindaraju L; Vignesh R; G Subramanian EM Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(3):512-516. PubMed ID: 32308330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant with three rotary instruments using crown down technique - An in vitro study. Jindal R; Singh S; Gupta S; Jindal P J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2012; 2(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 25737844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. Topçuoğlu HS; Demirbuga S; Topçuoğlu G Int Endod J; 2020 Mar; 53(3):403-409. PubMed ID: 31605377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the incidence of microcracks caused by Mtwo and ProTaper Next rotary file systems versus the self-adjusting file: A scanning electron microscopic study. Saha SG; Vijaywargiya N; Saxena D; Saha MK; Bharadwaj A; Dubey S J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(5):355-359. PubMed ID: 29386786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]