These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33552037)

  • 1. BioMaster: An Integrated Database and Analytic Platform to Provide Comprehensive Information About BioBrick Parts.
    Wang B; Yang H; Sun J; Dou C; Huang J; Guo FB
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():593979. PubMed ID: 33552037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts.
    Shetty RP; Endy D; Knight TF
    J Biol Eng; 2008 Apr; 2():5. PubMed ID: 18410688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A BioBrick compatible strategy for genetic modification of plants.
    Boyle PM; Burrill DR; Inniss MC; Agapakis CM; Deardon A; DeWerd JG; Gedeon MA; Quinn JY; Paull ML; Raman AM; Theilmann MR; Wang L; Winn JC; Medvedik O; Schellenberg K; Haynes KA; Viel A; Brenner TJ; Church GM; Shah JV; Silver PA
    J Biol Eng; 2012 Jun; 6(1):8. PubMed ID: 22716313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introduction of customized inserts for s-treamlined assembly and optimization of BioBrick synthetic genetic circuits.
    Norville JE; Derda R; Gupta S; Drinkwater KA; Belcher AM; Leschziner AE; Knight TF
    J Biol Eng; 2010 Dec; 4():17. PubMed ID: 21172029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assembly of standardized DNA parts using BioBrick ends in E. coli.
    Ho-Shing O; Lau KH; Vernon W; Eckdahl TT; Campbell AM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 852():61-76. PubMed ID: 22328426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biobrick chain recommendations for genetic circuit design.
    Yang J; Yu S; Gong B; An N; Alterovitz G
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Jul; 86():31-39. PubMed ID: 28499216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Bacillus BioBrick Box: generation and evaluation of essential genetic building blocks for standardized work with Bacillus subtilis.
    Radeck J; Kraft K; Bartels J; Cikovic T; Dürr F; Emenegger J; Kelterborn S; Sauer C; Fritz G; Gebhard S; Mascher T
    J Biol Eng; 2013 Dec; 7(1):29. PubMed ID: 24295448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard.
    Kelly JR; Rubin AJ; Davis JH; Ajo-Franklin CM; Cumbers J; Czar MJ; de Mora K; Glieberman AL; Monie DD; Endy D
    J Biol Eng; 2009 Mar; 3():4. PubMed ID: 19298678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assembly of BioBrick standard biological parts using three antibiotic assembly.
    Shetty R; Lizarazo M; Rettberg R; Knight TF
    Methods Enzymol; 2011; 498():311-26. PubMed ID: 21601683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BioBrick assembly standards and techniques and associated software tools.
    Røkke G; Korvald E; Pahr J; Oyås O; Lale R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1116():1-24. PubMed ID: 24395353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auxotrophy to Xeno-DNA: an exploration of combinatorial mechanisms for a high-fidelity biosafety system for synthetic biology applications.
    Whitford CM; Dymek S; Kerkhoff D; März C; Schmidt O; Edich M; Droste J; Pucker B; Rückert C; Kalinowski J
    J Biol Eng; 2018; 12():13. PubMed ID: 30123321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The case for decoupling assembly and submission standards to maintain a more flexible registry of biological parts.
    Alnahhas RN; Slater B; Huang Y; Mortensen C; Monk JW; Okasheh Y; Howard MD; Gottel NR; Hammerling MJ; Barrick JE
    J Biol Eng; 2014; 8(1):28. PubMed ID: 25525459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kappa rule-based modeling in synthetic biology.
    Wilson-Kanamori J; Danos V; Thomson T; Honorato-Zimmer R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1244():105-35. PubMed ID: 25487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GenoCAD for iGEM: a grammatical approach to the design of standard-compliant constructs.
    Cai Y; Wilson ML; Peccoud J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 May; 38(8):2637-44. PubMed ID: 20167639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring the burden of hundreds of BioBricks defines an evolutionary limit on constructability in synthetic biology.
    Radde N; Mortensen GA; Bhat D; Shah S; Clements JJ; Leonard SP; McGuffie MJ; Mishler DM; Barrick JE
    bioRxiv; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38645188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Bacillus BioBrick Box 2.0: expanding the genetic toolbox for the standardized work with Bacillus subtilis.
    Popp PF; Dotzler M; Radeck J; Bartels J; Mascher T
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15058. PubMed ID: 29118374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. iGEM 2021: A Year in Review.
    Moon H
    Biodes Res; 2022; 2022():9794609. PubMed ID: 37850126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methylase-assisted subcloning for high throughput BioBrick assembly.
    Matsumura I
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9841. PubMed ID: 32974095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One primer to rule them all: universal primer that adds BBa_B0034 ribosomal binding site to any coding standard 10 BioBrick.
    Bryksin AV; Bachman HN; Cooper SW; Balavijayan T; Blackstone RM; Du H; Jenkins JP; Haynes CL; Siemer JL; Fiore VF; Barker TH
    ACS Synth Biol; 2014 Dec; 3(12):956-9. PubMed ID: 25524097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Promoter element arising from the fusion of standard BioBrick parts.
    Yao AI; Fenton TA; Owsley K; Seitzer P; Larsen DJ; Sit H; Lau J; Nair A; Tantiongloc J; Tagkopoulos I; Facciotti MT
    ACS Synth Biol; 2013 Feb; 2(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 23656374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.