206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3355333)
1. Federal regulation of clinical laboratories. A prospective public policy analysis.
Hammond HC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 3355333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Medicare and Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act of 1967 proficiency testing requirements and its relationship to the private sector.
Edinger SE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 3281630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of an effective proficiency testing program to the regulation of clinical laboratories. The view from one state.
Bartola J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 3128246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating laboratory performance. Historical and governmental perspectives.
Boone DJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 3355332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The overall role of a proficiency testing program.
Rippey JH; Williamson WE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 3355328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proficiency testing. Its role in a voluntary clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Duckworth JK
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):346-8. PubMed ID: 3355330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
Fraser CG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. College of American Pathologists Conference XIII on the evaluation of proficiency testing results for quantitative methods in relation to clinical usefulness: concluding remarks.
Glenn GC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):471-2. PubMed ID: 3355350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Proficiency testing programs--promises, progress, and problems. A 40-year prospective.
Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 3355326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.
Lawson NS; Gilmore BF; Tholen DW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 3355348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the ability of proficiency testing programs to determine intralaboratory performance. Peer group statistics vs clinical usefulness limits.
Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 3355346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Internal quality control, proficiency testing, and the clinical relevance of laboratory testing.
Kafka MT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 3355347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The how and why of an accuracy base for proficiency testing programs.
Welch MJ; Hertz HS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 3355329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the impact of a CD4+ T-cell testing laboratory improvement program.
Rosner E; Siragusa M; Schalla W; Cross D; Cohn R; Hearn T
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9625418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current list of laboratories which meet minimum standards to engage in urine drug testing for federal agencies--ADAMHA. Notice.
Fed Regist; 1990 Dec; 55(238):50882-3. PubMed ID: 10128595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current list of laboratories which meet minimum standards to engage in urine drug testing for federal agencies--ADAMHA. Notice.
Fed Regist; 1990 Sep; 55(172):36317-8. PubMed ID: 10170592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A user's classification of problems identified by proficiency testing surveys.
Klee GG; Forsman RW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 3355334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A theoretical basis for clinically relevant proficiency testing evaluation limits. Sensitivity analysis of the effect of inherent test variability on acceptable method error.
Ross JW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 3355344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference values and participant means as targets in proficiency testing.
Tholen DW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Sep; 117(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 8368899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Programme.
Batjer JD
Clin Lab Haematol; 1990; 12 Suppl 1():135-8. PubMed ID: 2282757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
