293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3355342)
1. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
Fraser CG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed goals for analytical precision and accuracy in single-point diagnostic testing. Theoretical basis and comparison with data from College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys.
Harris EK
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 3355343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal quality control, proficiency testing, and the clinical relevance of laboratory testing.
Kafka MT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 3355347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A theoretical basis for clinically relevant proficiency testing evaluation limits. Sensitivity analysis of the effect of inherent test variability on acceptable method error.
Ross JW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 3355344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A statistical procedure for measuring and evaluating performance in interlaboratory comparison programs.
Tholen DW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 3355349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proficiency testing. Its role in a voluntary clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Duckworth JK
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):346-8. PubMed ID: 3355330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.
Lawson NS; Gilmore BF; Tholen DW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 3355348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An evaluation of the ability of proficiency testing programs to determine intralaboratory performance. Peer group statistics vs clinical usefulness limits.
Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 3355346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Desirable performance standards for imprecision and bias in alternate sites. The views of laboratory professionals.
Fraser CG; Petersen PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Oct; 119(10):909-13. PubMed ID: 7487389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proficiency testing of enzymes. Charting the way toward standardization.
Lott JA; Tholen DW; Massion CG
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 3355340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The overall role of a proficiency testing program.
Rippey JH; Williamson WE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 3355328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution of evaluation criteria in the College of American Pathologists Surveys.
Ross JW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 3355327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. College of American Pathologists Conference XIII on the evaluation of proficiency testing results for quantitative methods in relation to clinical usefulness: concluding remarks.
Glenn GC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):471-2. PubMed ID: 3355350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The how and why of an accuracy base for proficiency testing programs.
Welch MJ; Hertz HS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 3355329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of an effective proficiency testing program to the regulation of clinical laboratories. The view from one state.
Bartola J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 3128246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proficiency testing programs--promises, progress, and problems. A 40-year prospective.
Laessig RH; Ehrmeyer SS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 3355326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal regulation of clinical laboratories. A prospective public policy analysis.
Hammond HC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 3355333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survey of special practices associated with College of American Pathologists proficiency testing in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Cembrowski GS; Vanderlinde RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):374-6. PubMed ID: 3355335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A user's classification of problems identified by proficiency testing surveys.
Klee GG; Forsman RW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 3355334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating laboratory performance. Historical and governmental perspectives.
Boone DJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 3355332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
