These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3355344)

  • 1. A theoretical basis for clinically relevant proficiency testing evaluation limits. Sensitivity analysis of the effect of inherent test variability on acceptable method error.
    Ross JW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 3355344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proposed goals for analytical precision and accuracy in single-point diagnostic testing. Theoretical basis and comparison with data from College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys.
    Harris EK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 3355343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
    Fraser CG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cholesterol measurements. Quality assurance and medical usefulness interrelationships.
    Oxley DK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 3355339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the ability of proficiency testing programs to determine intralaboratory performance. Peer group statistics vs clinical usefulness limits.
    Ehrmeyer SS; Laessig RH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):444-8. PubMed ID: 3355346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution of evaluation criteria in the College of American Pathologists Surveys.
    Ross JW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 3355327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internal quality control, proficiency testing, and the clinical relevance of laboratory testing.
    Kafka MT
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 3355347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A statistical procedure for measuring and evaluating performance in interlaboratory comparison programs.
    Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 3355349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the clinical accuracy of laboratory tests.
    Zweig MH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 3355338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The how and why of an accuracy base for proficiency testing programs.
    Welch MJ; Hertz HS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 3355329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical relevance of laboratory tests. A clinical perspective.
    Watts NB
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):379-82. PubMed ID: 3355337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.
    Lawson NS; Gilmore BF; Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 3355348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference values and participant means as targets in proficiency testing.
    Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Sep; 117(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 8368899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. College of American Pathologists Conference XIII on the evaluation of proficiency testing results for quantitative methods in relation to clinical usefulness: concluding remarks.
    Glenn GC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):471-2. PubMed ID: 3355350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proficiency testing of enzymes. Charting the way toward standardization.
    Lott JA; Tholen DW; Massion CG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 3355340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ways of assessing quality goals for diagnostic tests in clinical situations.
    Petersen PH; Hørder M
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 3355345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A user's classification of problems identified by proficiency testing surveys.
    Klee GG; Forsman RW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 3355334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The overall role of a proficiency testing program.
    Rippey JH; Williamson WE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 3355328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proficiency testing. Its role in a voluntary clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program.
    Duckworth JK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):346-8. PubMed ID: 3355330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.