These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3355350)

  • 1. College of American Pathologists Conference XIII on the evaluation of proficiency testing results for quantitative methods in relation to clinical usefulness: concluding remarks.
    Glenn GC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):471-2. PubMed ID: 3355350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proficiency testing. Its role in a voluntary clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program.
    Duckworth JK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):346-8. PubMed ID: 3355330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. College of American Pathologists Conference XIII on the evaluation of proficiency testing results for quantitative methods in relation to clinical usefulness: review and comments.
    Hartmann AE; Ross JW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):473-4. PubMed ID: 2895626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. College of American Pathologists Conference XIII. Evaluation of proficiency testing results for quantitative methods in relation to clinical usefulness. September 2-4, 1987.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):327-474. PubMed ID: 3355324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The how and why of an accuracy base for proficiency testing programs.
    Welch MJ; Hertz HS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 3355329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey of special practices associated with College of American Pathologists proficiency testing in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
    Cembrowski GS; Vanderlinde RE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):374-6. PubMed ID: 3355335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of evaluation criteria in the College of American Pathologists Surveys.
    Ross JW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 3355327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposed goals for analytical precision and accuracy in single-point diagnostic testing. Theoretical basis and comparison with data from College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys.
    Harris EK
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 3355343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal quality control, proficiency testing, and the clinical relevance of laboratory testing.
    Kafka MT
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 3355347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The overall role of a proficiency testing program.
    Rippey JH; Williamson WE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 3355328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A user's classification of problems identified by proficiency testing surveys.
    Klee GG; Forsman RW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 3355334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiprogram characterization of laboratory bias, precision, and total error. Proposal for improved assessment with shared external and expanded internal (regional) quality control pools.
    Lawson NS; Gilmore BF; Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 3355348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of an effective proficiency testing program to the regulation of clinical laboratories. The view from one state.
    Bartola J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 3128246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The application of theoretical goals based on biological variation data in proficiency testing.
    Fraser CG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 3355342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A theoretical basis for clinically relevant proficiency testing evaluation limits. Sensitivity analysis of the effect of inherent test variability on acceptable method error.
    Ross JW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 3355344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Federal regulation of clinical laboratories. A prospective public policy analysis.
    Hammond HC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 3355333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating laboratory performance. Historical and governmental perspectives.
    Boone DJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 3355332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A statistical procedure for measuring and evaluating performance in interlaboratory comparison programs.
    Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 3355349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proficiency testing of enzymes. Charting the way toward standardization.
    Lott JA; Tholen DW; Massion CG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):392-8. PubMed ID: 3355340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference values and participant means as targets in proficiency testing.
    Tholen DW
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Sep; 117(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 8368899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.