120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33554244)
1. Analysis of outcomes of a transoral circular stapled anastomosis following major upper gastrointestinal cancer resection.
Foley DM; Emanuwa EJE; Knight WRC; Baker CR; Kelly M; McEwan R; Zylstra J; Davies AR; Gossage JA
Dis Esophagus; 2021 Nov; 34(11):. PubMed ID: 33554244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extending the reach of stapled anastomosis with a prepared OrVil™ device in laparoscopic oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.
Salih AE; Bass GA; D'Cruz Y; Brennan RP; Smolarek S; Arumugasamy M; Walsh TN
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):961-71. PubMed ID: 25159628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.
Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS
World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. OrVil™-assisted anastomosis in laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgery: friend of the laparoscopic surgeon.
Marangoni G; Villa F; Shamil E; Botha AJ
Surg Endosc; 2012 Mar; 26(3):811-7. PubMed ID: 21993942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Two Circular-Stapled Techniques for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Lin H; Liang G; Chai H; Liao Y; Zhang C; Cheng Y
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():759599. PubMed ID: 34976807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the transoral circular stapler for oesophagogastrectomy after induction therapy.
Wang L; Milman S; Ng T
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 Dec; 29(6):890-896. PubMed ID: 31436809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phase II Trial Evaluating Esophageal Anastomotic Reinforcement with a Biologic, Degradable, Extracellular Matrix after Total Gastrectomy and Esophagectomy.
Vos EL; Nakauchi M; Capanu M; Park BJ; Coit DG; Molena D; Yoon SS; Jones DR; Strong VE
J Am Coll Surg; 2022 May; 234(5):910-917. PubMed ID: 35426405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term outcomes after hand-sewn versus circular-stapled (25 and 29 mm) anastomotic technique after esophagogastrectomy for esophageal cancer.
Rostas JW; Graffree BD; Scoggins CR; McMasters KM; Martin RCG
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(3):469-472. PubMed ID: 29044576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of a novel intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic technique.
Kesler KA; Ramchandani NK; Jalal SI; Stokes SM; Mankins MR; Ceppa D; Birdas TJ; Vardas PN; Rieger KM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Oct; 156(4):1739-1745.e1. PubMed ID: 30033105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Circular incision and cutting, a novel treatment for patients with esophageal cancer with anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy.
Jie MM; Hu CJ; Tang B; Xie X; Lin H; Yu J; Yang SM
J Dig Dis; 2019 Jan; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 30484968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Technical Modification to the Circular Stapling Anastomosis Technique During Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Procedure.
Valmasoni M; Capovilla G; Pierobon ES; Moletta L; Provenzano L; Costantini M; Salvador R; Merigliano S
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Dec; 29(12):1585-1591. PubMed ID: 31580751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program.
Mungo B; Lidor AO; Stem M; Molena D
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1692-8. PubMed ID: 26123339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Robotic Approach on Post-Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Wu J; Putnam LR; Silva JP; Houghton C; Bildzukewicz N; Lipham JC
Am Surg; 2022 Oct; 88(10):2499-2507. PubMed ID: 35652374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An analysis of the risk factors of anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy.
Tanaka K; Makino T; Yamasaki M; Nishigaki T; Miyazaki Y; Takahashi T; Kurokawa Y; Nakajima K; Takiguchi S; Mori M; Doki Y
Surg Today; 2018 Apr; 48(4):449-454. PubMed ID: 29170824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
