These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33555417)

  • 1. A chimpanzee recognizes varied acoustical versions of sine-wave and noise-vocoded speech.
    Heimbauer LA; Beran MJ; Owren MJ
    Anim Cogn; 2021 Jul; 24(4):843-854. PubMed ID: 33555417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A chimpanzee recognizes synthetic speech with significantly reduced acoustic cues to phonetic content.
    Heimbauer LA; Beran MJ; Owren MJ
    Curr Biol; 2011 Jul; 21(14):1210-4. PubMed ID: 21723125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.
    Souza P; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):792-805. PubMed ID: 19640044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
    Rosen S; Hui SN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Degraded and computer-generated speech processing in a bonobo.
    Lahiff NJ; Slocombe KE; Taglialatela J; Dellwo V; Townsend SW
    Anim Cogn; 2022 Dec; 25(6):1393-1398. PubMed ID: 35595881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Toddlers' comprehension of degraded signals: Noise-vocoded versus sine-wave analogs.
    Newman RS; Chatterjee M; Morini G; Remez RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL311-7. PubMed ID: 26428832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of Temporal Envelope Cutoff Frequency, Number of Channels, and Carrier Type on Brainstem Neural Representation of Pitch in Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 65(8):3146-3164. PubMed ID: 35944032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech.
    Hervais-Adelman AG; Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Taylor KJ; Carlyon RP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):283-95. PubMed ID: 21077718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Studying the Effect of Carrier Type on the Perception of Vocoded Stimuli via Mismatch Negativity.
    Xu D; Zheng D; Chen F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():3167-3170. PubMed ID: 31946560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K; Araki T; Nakajima Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The representation of noise vocoded speech in the auditory nerve of the chinchilla: physiological correlates of the perception of spectrally reduced speech.
    Loebach JL; Wickesberg RE
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):130-44. PubMed ID: 16497455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do We Perceive Others Better than Ourselves? A Perceptual Benefit for Noise-Vocoded Speech Produced by an Average Speaker.
    Schuerman WL; Meyer A; McQueen JM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129731. PubMed ID: 26134279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral and temporal resolutions of information-bearing acoustic changes for understanding vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE; Goupell MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):844-55. PubMed ID: 25698018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.
    Fogerty D; Xu J; Gibbs BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1800. PubMed ID: 27914381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception of sine-wave signals by children with cochlear implants.
    Nittrouer S; Kuess J; Lowenstein JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2811-22. PubMed ID: 25994709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners.
    Shofner WP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):2065-77. PubMed ID: 25235004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perceptual organization of sine-wave speech under competitive conditions.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):804-17. PubMed ID: 20707450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.