These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33555417)

  • 21. Toddlers' fast-mapping from noise-vocoded speech.
    Newman RS; Morini G; Shroads E; Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2432. PubMed ID: 32359241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Listeners Experience Linguistic Masking Release in Noise-Vocoded Speech-in-Speech Recognition.
    Viswanathan N; Kokkinakis K; Williams BT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Feb; 61(2):428-435. PubMed ID: 29396580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Does training with amplitude modulated tones affect tone-vocoded speech perception?
    Casaponsa A; Sohoglu E; Moore DR; Füllgrabe C; Molloy K; Amitay S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226288. PubMed ID: 31881550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
    Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Relative contributions of formants to the intelligibility of sine-wave sentences in Mandarin Chinese.
    Han Y; Chen F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):EL495. PubMed ID: 28618801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perception of degraded speech by chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger): Word-level stimulus generalization.
    Shofner WP; Yacko N; Bowdrie K
    J Comp Psychol; 2019 Aug; 133(3):326-339. PubMed ID: 30589293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of speech fidelity in the irrelevant sound effect: Insights from noise-vocoded speech backgrounds.
    Dorsi J; Viswanathan N; Rosenblum LD; Dias JW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Oct; 71(10):2152-2161. PubMed ID: 30226434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.
    Stilp C; Donaldson G; Oh S; Kong YY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3971. PubMed ID: 27908030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception of speech modulation cues by 6-month-old infants.
    Cabrera L; Bertoncini J; Lorenzi C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 56(6):1733-44. PubMed ID: 24023378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The psychoacoustics of noise vocoded speech: a physiological means to a perceptual end.
    Loebach JL; Wickesberg RE
    Hear Res; 2008 Jul; 241(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 18556159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recognition of vocoded words and sentences in quiet and multi-talker babble with children and adults.
    Goupell MJ; Draves GT; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244632. PubMed ID: 33373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Older and younger adults' identification of sentences filtered with amplitude and frequency modulations in quiet and noise.
    Mahajan Y; Kim J; Davis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL190. PubMed ID: 28863573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acoustic source characteristics, across-formant integration, and speech intelligibility under competitive conditions.
    Roberts B; Summers RJ; Bailey PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):680-91. PubMed ID: 25751040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory-phonetic projection and lexical structure in the recognition of sine-wave words.
    Remez RE; Dubowski KR; Broder RS; Davids ML; Grossman YS; Moskalenko M; Pardo JS; Hasbun SM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):968-77. PubMed ID: 21443384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.