121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33555746)
1. Streamlining the Cochlear Implant Evaluation: Utility of Community Audiometry in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Assessment.
Shah RR; Jeon JW; Naples JG; Hwa TP; Davis S; Eliades SJ; Brant JA; Bigelow DC; Ruckenstein MJ
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Mar; 42(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 33555746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can routine office-based audiometry predict cochlear implant evaluation results?
Gubbels SP; Gartrell BC; Ploch JL; Hanson KD
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jan; 127(1):216-222. PubMed ID: 27797418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Clinical Audiologic Measures to Determine Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Reddy P; Dornhoffer JR; Camposeo EL; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 35038700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of Pure-Tone Audiologic Thresholds for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidacy: A Systematic Review.
de Kleijn JL; van Kalmthout LWM; van der Vossen MJB; Vonck BMD; Topsakal V; Bruijnzeel H
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jul; 144(7):630-638. PubMed ID: 29800000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audiogram and cochlear implant candidacy--UK perspective.
Chundu S; Flynn SL
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jul; 15(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 24144046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Zhang E; Coelho DH
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):979-986. PubMed ID: 29912832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing Preservation in Pediatric Cochlear Implantation.
Carlson ML; Patel NS; Tombers NM; DeJong MD; Breneman AI; Neff BA; Driscoll CLW
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e128-e133. PubMed ID: 28538468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AI model for predicting adult cochlear implant candidacy using routine behavioral audiometry.
Carlson ML; Carducci V; Deep NL; DeJong MD; Poling GL; Brufau SR
Am J Otolaryngol; 2024; 45(4):104337. PubMed ID: 38677145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicenter study with a direct acoustic cochlear implant.
Lenarz T; Zwartenkot JW; Stieger C; Schwab B; Mylanus EA; Caversaccio M; Kompis M; Snik AF; D'hondt C; Mojallal H
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23921930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisive criteria between stapedotomy and cochlear implantation in patients with far advanced otosclerosis.
Kabbara B; Gauche C; Calmels MN; Lepage B; Escude B; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Marx M
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):e73-8. PubMed ID: 25548892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Racial Disparities in Adult Cochlear Implantation.
Mahendran GN; Rosenbluth T; Featherstone M; Vivas EX; Mattox DE; Hobson CE
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Jun; 166(6):1099-1105. PubMed ID: 34311626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audiometric Profile of Cochlear Implant Recipients Demonstrates Need for Revising Insurance Coverage.
Barnes JH; Yin LX; Marinelli JP; Carlson ML
Laryngoscope; 2021 Jun; 131(6):E2007-E. PubMed ID: 33347621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of unilateral vs. bilateral evaluation on cochlear implant candidacy.
Hoppe U; Hocke T; Hast A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 144(3):207-218. PubMed ID: 38648394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the United States Patient Population Size Meeting Audiologic Candidacy for Cochlear Implantation.
Yu K; Shen S; Bowditch S; Sun D
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Mar; 170(3):870-876. PubMed ID: 37997296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Audiometry-Based Screening Procedure for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Hoppe U; Hast A; Hocke T
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):1001-5. PubMed ID: 25700016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing preservation and improved speech perception with a flexible 28-mm electrode.
Helbig S; Helbig M; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Rader T
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 25299833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.
Carlson ML; Driscoll CL; Gifford RH; Service GJ; Tombers NM; Hughes-Borst BJ; Neff BA; Beatty CW
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):962-8. PubMed ID: 21659922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When to Refer a Hearing-impaired Patient for a Cochlear Implant Evaluation.
Hunter JB; Tolisano AM
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jun; 42(5):e530-e535. PubMed ID: 33394941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
