BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

751 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33556230)

  • 1. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination compared with sorafenib as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China and the United states.
    Wen F; Zheng H; Zhang P; Liao W; Zhou K; Li Q
    Liver Int; 2021 May; 41(5):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 33556230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Su D; Wu B; Shi L
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-reported outcomes with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (IMbrave150): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.
    Galle PR; Finn RS; Qin S; Ikeda M; Zhu AX; Kim TY; Kudo M; Breder V; Merle P; Kaseb A; Li D; Mulla S; Verret W; Xu DZ; Hernandez S; Ding B; Liu J; Huang C; Lim HY; Cheng AL; Ducreux M
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Jul; 22(7):991-1001. PubMed ID: 34051880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic Evaluation of Sintilimab Plus Bevacizumab Versus Sorafenib as a First-line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Zhou T; Cao Y; Wang X; Yang L; Wang Z; Ma A; Li H
    Adv Ther; 2022 May; 39(5):2165-2177. PubMed ID: 35296994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cheng AL; Qin S; Ikeda M; Galle PR; Ducreux M; Kim TY; Lim HY; Kudo M; Breder V; Merle P; Kaseb AO; Li D; Verret W; Ma N; Nicholas A; Wang Y; Li L; Zhu AX; Finn RS
    J Hepatol; 2022 Apr; 76(4):862-873. PubMed ID: 34902530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
    Gong H; Ong SC; Li F; Weng Z; Zhao K; Jiang Z
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Mar; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 37004046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus nivolumab as first-line treatment for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Li Y; Liang X; Li H; Chen X
    Cancer; 2022 Nov; 128(22):3995-4003. PubMed ID: 36111952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Combination Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
    Criss SD; Mooradian MJ; Watson TR; Gainor JF; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911952. PubMed ID: 31553470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Systemic Treatments for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China: An Economic Evaluation Based on Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zhao M; Pan X; Yin Y; Hu H; Wei J; Bai Z; Tang W
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():869960. PubMed ID: 35493395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transarterial Radioembolization Versus Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Time to Deterioration in Quality of Life.
    Agirrezabal I; Brennan VK; Colaone F; Shergill S; Pereira H; Chatellier G; Vilgrain V
    Adv Ther; 2022 May; 39(5):2035-2051. PubMed ID: 35279814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Finn RS; Qin S; Ikeda M; Galle PR; Ducreux M; Kim TY; Kudo M; Breder V; Merle P; Kaseb AO; Li D; Verret W; Xu DZ; Hernandez S; Liu J; Huang C; Mulla S; Wang Y; Lim HY; Zhu AX; Cheng AL;
    N Engl J Med; 2020 May; 382(20):1894-1905. PubMed ID: 32402160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (GO30140): an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b study.
    Lee MS; Ryoo BY; Hsu CH; Numata K; Stein S; Verret W; Hack SP; Spahn J; Liu B; Abdullah H; Wang Y; He AR; Lee KH;
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Jun; 21(6):808-820. PubMed ID: 32502443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabozantinib as second-line therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Liao W; Huang J; Hutton D; Zhu G; Wu Q; Wen F; Bai L; Li Q
    Liver Int; 2019 Dec; 39(12):2408-2416. PubMed ID: 31544330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus an Anti-VEGF Antibody as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Li L; Yang S; Chen Y; Tian L; He Y; Wu B; Dong D
    Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():891008. PubMed ID: 35721168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. First-line systemic treatment strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wang L; Peng Y; Qin S; Wan X; Zeng X; Li S; Liu Q; Tan C
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0279786. PubMed ID: 37053300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immunotherapy or targeted therapy as the first-line strategies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Liu K; Zhu Y; Zhu H
    Front Immunol; 2022; 13():1103055. PubMed ID: 36713376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FDA Approval Summary: Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Casak SJ; Donoghue M; Fashoyin-Aje L; Jiang X; Rodriguez L; Shen YL; Xu Y; Jiang X; Liu J; Zhao H; Pierce WF; Mehta S; Goldberg KB; Theoret MR; Kluetz PG; Pazdur R; Lemery SJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2021 Apr; 27(7):1836-1841. PubMed ID: 33139264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Cost Effectiveness of Donafenib Compared With Sorafenib for the First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma in China.
    Meng R; Cao Y; Zhou T; Hu H; Qiu Y
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():794131. PubMed ID: 35433574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib Versus Sorafenib as a First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Chinese Health Care System.
    Lang W; Deng L; Huang B; Zhong D; Zhang G; Lu M; Ouyang M
    Clin Drug Investig; 2024 Mar; 44(3):149-162. PubMed ID: 38300386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.