These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33556376)

  • 21. The evolution of age-specific choosiness and reproductive isolation in a model with overlapping generations.
    Cotto O; Servedio MR; Day T
    Evolution; 2022 Feb; 76(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 34877658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta-analysis shows the evidence for context-dependent mating behaviour is inconsistent or weak across animals.
    Dougherty LR
    Ecol Lett; 2021 Apr; 24(4):862-875. PubMed ID: 33471386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evolution of age-specific choosiness when mating.
    Cotto O; Day T
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):477-485. PubMed ID: 33314385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby.
    Lindström K; Lehtonen TK
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Aug; 280(1765):20130983. PubMed ID: 23804620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Corticosterone mediated mate choice affects female mating reluctance and reproductive success.
    Romero-Diaz C; Gonzalez-Jimena V; Fitze PS
    Horm Behav; 2019 Jul; 113():1-12. PubMed ID: 31034792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of temperature on mating behaviour and mating success: A meta-analysis.
    Pilakouta N; Baillet A
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Aug; 91(8):1642-1650. PubMed ID: 35811382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection.
    Brooks R; Endler JA
    Evolution; 2001 Aug; 55(8):1644-55. PubMed ID: 11580024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mating increases Drosophila melanogaster females' choosiness by reducing olfactory sensitivity to a male pheromone.
    Kohlmeier P; Zhang Y; Gorter JA; Su CY; Billeter JC
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2021 Aug; 5(8):1165-1173. PubMed ID: 34155384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species.
    Kozak GM; Head ML; Lackey AC; Boughman JW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 23194003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Baugh AT; Bee MA; Gall MD
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2019 Aug; 205(4):629-639. PubMed ID: 31227859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does competition allow male mate choosiness in threespine sticklebacks?
    Candolin U; Salesto T
    Am Nat; 2009 Feb; 173(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 19117472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hormonal modulation of phonotaxis and advertisement-call preferences in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Gordon NM; Gerhardt HC
    Horm Behav; 2009 Jan; 55(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 18926827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nineteen Years of Consistently Positive and Strong Female Mate Preferences despite Individual Variation.
    Ryan MJ; Akre KL; Baugh AT; Bernal XE; Lea AM; Leslie C; Still MB; Wylie DC; Rand AS
    Am Nat; 2019 Aug; 194(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 31318282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.
    Bel-Venner MC; Dray S; Allainé D; Menu F; Venner S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Jan; 275(1630):77-82. PubMed ID: 17956845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Condition dependence of female choosiness in a field cricket.
    Judge KA; Ting JJ; Gwynne DT
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2529-40. PubMed ID: 25288123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of intracerebroventricular arginine vasotocin on a female amphibian proceptive behavior.
    Boyd SK
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2019 Aug; 205(4):505-513. PubMed ID: 31089809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MUTUAL MATE CHOICE AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN CHOOSINESS.
    Johnstone RA; Reynolds JD; Deutsch JC
    Evolution; 1996 Aug; 50(4):1382-1391. PubMed ID: 28565695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Direct detection of male quality can facilitate the evolution of female choosiness and indicators of good genes: Evolution across a continuum of indicator mechanisms.
    Dhole S; Stern CA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 29528491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.