These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33556888)

  • 1. Computational and experimental analysis of a Glaucoma flat drainage device.
    Panduro RMR; Monterrey C; Mantari JL; Canahuire R; Alvarez H; Miranda M; Elsheikh A
    J Biomech; 2021 Mar; 118():110234. PubMed ID: 33556888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thin-film coupled fluid-solid analysis of flow through the Ahmed glaucoma drainage device.
    Stay MS; Pan T; Brown JD; Ziaie B; Barocas VH
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Oct; 127(5):776-81. PubMed ID: 16248307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polymeric check valve with an elevated pedestal for precise cracking pressure in a glaucoma drainage device.
    Park CJ; Yang DS; Cha JJ; Lee JH
    Biomed Microdevices; 2016 Feb; 18(1):20. PubMed ID: 26864969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal graft survival and intraocular pressure control after penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage device implantation.
    Arroyave CP; Scott IU; Fantes FE; Feuer WJ; Murray TG
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Nov; 108(11):1978-85. PubMed ID: 11713065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selectively bonded polymeric glaucoma drainage device for reliable regulation of intraocular pressure.
    Moon S; Im S; An J; Park CJ; Kim HG; Park SW; Kim HI; Lee JH
    Biomed Microdevices; 2012 Apr; 14(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 22094823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a micro-mechanical valve in a novel glaucoma implant.
    Siewert S; Schultze C; Schmidt W; Hinze U; Chichkov B; Wree A; Sternberg K; Allemann R; Guthoff R; Schmitz KP
    Biomed Microdevices; 2012 Oct; 14(5):907-20. PubMed ID: 22711457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus second glaucoma drainage device after prior aqueous tube shunt surgery.
    Murakami Y; Akil H; Chahal J; Dustin L; Tan J; Chopra V; Francis B
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 45(3):241-246. PubMed ID: 27570215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Efficacy and Complications of Cyclophotocoagulation and Second Glaucoma Drainage Device After Initial Glaucoma Drainage Device Failure.
    Wang MY; Patel K; Blieden LS; Chuang AZ; Baker LA; Bell NP; Feldman RM
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Nov; 26(11):1010-1018. PubMed ID: 28858156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Continuous intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement during glaucoma drainage device implantation.
    Gouws P; Moss EB; Trope GE; Ethier CR
    J Glaucoma; 2007 May; 16(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 17438429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Home Tonometry Assists Glaucoma Drainage Device Management in Childhood Glaucoma.
    Go MS; Barman NR; House RJ; Freedman SF
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Sep; 28(9):818-822. PubMed ID: 31283699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental flow studies in glaucoma drainage device development.
    AGFID project team
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Oct; 85(10):1231-6. PubMed ID: 11567970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Filtration Bleb and Endplate Positioning Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Eyes Implanted with Long-Tube Glaucoma Drainage Devices.
    Sano I; Tanito M; Uchida K; Katsube T; Kitagaki H; Ohira A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144595. PubMed ID: 26641251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective review of pars plana versus anterior chamber placement of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device.
    Rososinski A; Wechsler D; Grigg J
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Feb; 24(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 23787335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term results of glaucoma drainage device surgery.
    Purtskhvanidze K; Saeger M; Treumer F; Roider J; Nölle B
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):14. PubMed ID: 30630462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel membrane-tube type glaucoma shunt device for glaucoma surgery.
    Ahn BH; Hwang YH; Han JC
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 44(9):776-782. PubMed ID: 27144958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the Numbers and the Shapes of Venting Slits on Intraocular Pressure after Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implant.
    Honda R; Kasuga T; Murakami A; Matsuda A
    Curr Eye Res; 2019 Aug; 44(8):921-924. PubMed ID: 30892956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluid and structure coupling analysis of the interaction between aqueous humor and iris.
    Wang W; Qian X; Song H; Zhang M; Liu Z
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 2):133. PubMed ID: 28155692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of pars plana with anterior chamber glaucoma drainage device implantation for glaucoma: a meta-analysis.
    Wang B; Li W
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):212. PubMed ID: 30157805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined vitrectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation surgical approach for complex pediatric glaucomas.
    Ozgonul C; Besirli CG; Bohnsack BL
    J AAPOS; 2017 Apr; 21(2):121-126. PubMed ID: 28254440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of bleb capsule porosity with an experimental glaucoma drainage device and measurement system.
    Ross C; Pandav SS; Li YQ; Nguyen DQ; Beirne S; Wallace GG; Shaarawy T; Crowston JG; Coote M
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 133(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 25719729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.