These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33556966)

  • 1. Prediction of Behavioral T/C Levels in Cochlear Implant Patients Based Upon Analysis of Electrode Impedances.
    Zarowski A; Molisz A; Cardinael E; Vermeiren A; Theunen T; De Coninck L; Theuwis L; Siebert J; Offeciers FE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Oct; 31(9):674-679. PubMed ID: 33556966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electric compound action potentials (ECAPs) and impedances in an open and closed operative site during cochlear implantation.
    Christov F; Gluth MB; Lahti SJ; Ludwig S; Hans S; Holtmann LC; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the pre- or postlingual status of cochlear implant recipients on behavioural T/C-levels.
    Zarowski A; Molisz A; De Coninck L; Vermeiren A; Theunen T; Theuwis L; Przewoźny T; Siebert J; Offeciers FE
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109867. PubMed ID: 31999994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postimplantation changes of electrophysiological parameters in patients with cochlear implants.
    Molisz A; Zarowski A; Vermeiren A; Theunen T; De Coninck L; Siebert J; Offeciers EF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 25969138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
    Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of stimulus presentation rate on intraoperative ECAP thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    Molisz A; Zarowski A; Theunen T; Vermeiren A; De Coninck L; Przewoźny T; Siebert J; Offeciers EF
    Int J Audiol; 2019 May; 58(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 30636507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of electrophysiological parameters between perimodiolar and lateral wall electrodes in paediatric cochlear implant users.
    Zarowski A; Molisz A; Mylanus EAM; Miserus JHM; Leblans M; van Dinther J; Siebert J; Offeciers EF
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 277(10):2693-2699. PubMed ID: 32342198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials for Cochlear Implant Fitting: A Systematic Review.
    de Vos JJ; Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; Boot PS; van Gendt MJ; Dekkers OM; Fiocco M; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):401-411. PubMed ID: 28945656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship Between Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise and Fitting Parameters, Impedances and ECAP Thresholds in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    de Graaff F; Lissenberg-Witte BI; Kaandorp MW; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):935-947. PubMed ID: 31702597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation between neural response telemetry measurements and fitting levels.
    Ries M; Kelava I; Ajduk J; Košec A; Žaja R; Trotić R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 182():112001. PubMed ID: 38885546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-Assessment of Cochlear Health by New Cochlear Implant Recipients: Daily Impedance, Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Electrocochleography Measurements Over the First Three Postoperative Months.
    Mushtaq F; Soulby A; Boyle P; Papoutselou E; Nunn T; Hartley DEH
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Aug; 45(7):e517-e524. PubMed ID: 38918070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward neural health measurements for cochlear implantation: The relationship among electrode positioning, the electrically evoked action potential, impedances and behavioral stimulation levels.
    Lambriks L; van Hoof M; Debruyne J; Janssen M; Hof J; Hellingman K; Devocht E; George E
    Front Neurol; 2023; 14():1093265. PubMed ID: 36846130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Intraoperative Cochlear Implant Electrode Conditioning on Impedances and Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Oberhoffner T; Mlynski R; Schraven S; Brademann G; Dierker A; Spitzer P; Hey M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2024 Feb; 71(2):650-659. PubMed ID: 37682654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.