These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 335580)

  • 1. The Dalkon Shield, the TCu 200, and the TCu 380A in private practice.
    Thomas WO
    Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1977; 44():78-85. PubMed ID: 335580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices.
    Rioux JE; Cloutier D; Dupont P; Lamonde D
    CMAJ; 1986 Apr; 134(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 3948091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand.
    Reinprayoon D; Gilmore C; Farr G; Amatya R
    Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9865999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance of the TCu 380A and Lippes Loop IUDs in three developing countries.
    Farr G; Amatya R; Acosta M; Ekwempu C; Kisninci H
    Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8521710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings.
    Mumford SD; Kessel E
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion of TCu 380A intrauterine device: 12 month follow-up of 910 cases].
    Xu J; Zhuang L; Yu G
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Jun; 32(6):354-7. PubMed ID: 9596916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period].
    Lara Ricalde R; Menocal Tobías G; Ramos Pérez C; Velázquez Ramírez N
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Jun; 74(6):306-11. PubMed ID: 16970116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the delta copper T and the copper T 200 in Bologna, Italy.
    Melega C; Biscontin S; Canedi L; Marchesini FP; Tirelli S; Bartolotti T; Flamigni C
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1986; 17(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 3727892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Randomized comparative study of GyneFix IN and TCu 380A intrauterine devices].
    Wu S; Hu J; Wu M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Jun; 33(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 10806672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.
    Lee NC; Rubin GL; Ory HW; Burkman RT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 6856209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between intrauterine contraceptive device use and breast-feeding status at time of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion: analysis of TCu-380A acceptors in developing countries.
    Farr G; Rivera R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jul; 167(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 1442918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized comparative study of the copper T 300, Dalkon shield, and Shell Loop in parous women.
    Cooper DL; Israel R; Mishell DR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 May; 45(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 1124175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contraceptive efficacy of the Copper T 380A and Copper T 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries.
    Farr G; Amatya R
    Contraception; 1994 Mar; 49(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 8200217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems.
    Sivin I
    Contraception; 1993 Jul; 48(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8403900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. TCu 380A IUD: a reversible permanent contraceptive method in women over 35 years of age.
    Bahamondes L; Faundes A; Sobreira-Lima B; Lui-Filho JF; Pecci P; Matera S
    Contraception; 2005 Nov; 72(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 16246658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Martorella LA; Esposito JM
    J Reprod Med; 1975 Apr; 14(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 1142352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. IUDs: current perspectives.
    Hepburn S
    Curr Ther (Seaforth); 1994 Oct; 35(10):49-55. PubMed ID: 12319352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
    Xu JX; Rivera R; Dunson TR; Zhuang LQ; Yang XL; Ma GT; Chi IC
    Contraception; 1996 Jul; 54(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8804806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.