482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33558056)
1. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
Gurpinar B; Tak O
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 12(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 33149851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence.
Diker B; Tak Ö
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study.
Mangano FG; Admakin O; Bonacina M; Lerner H; Rutkunas V; Mangano C
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):263. PubMed ID: 32962680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces.
Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch.
Medina-Sotomayor P; Pascual-Moscardo A; Camps A I
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 30598308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.
Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
