212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33558657)
1. Concordance between results of inexpensive statistical models and multigene signatures in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.
Slembrouck L; Vanden Bempt I; Wildiers H; Smeets A; Van Rompuy AS; Van Ongeval C; Jongen L; Weltens C; Punie K; Hoste G; Van Nieuwenhuysen E; Han S; Nevelsteen I; Neven P; Floris G
Mod Pathol; 2021 Jul; 34(7):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 33558657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases.
Sechrist H; Glasgow A; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
Hum Pathol; 2020 Oct; 104():54-65. PubMed ID: 32758491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between modified Magee equation-2 and Oncotype-Dx recurrence scores using both traditional and TAILORx cutoffs and the clinical application of the Magee Decision Algorithm: a single institutional review.
Glasgow A; Sechrist H; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):321-328. PubMed ID: 32951186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases.
Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Estrogen receptors, Progesterone receptors and HER2-neu immunohistochemistry results in breast cancer with those of Oncotype Dx.
Sughayer MA; Alhassoon S; Sughayer HM
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Aug; 47():151556. PubMed ID: 32592992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The multigene signature MammaPrint impacts on multidisciplinary team decisions in ER+, HER2- early breast cancer.
Exner R; Bago-Horvath Z; Bartsch R; Mittlboeck M; Retèl VP; Fitzal F; Rudas M; Singer C; Pfeiler G; Gnant M; Jakesz R; Dubsky P
Br J Cancer; 2014 Aug; 111(5):837-42. PubMed ID: 25003667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk stratification of ER-positive breast cancer patients: A multi-institutional validation and outcome study of the Rochester Modified Magee algorithm (RoMMa) and prediction of an Oncotype DX
Turner BM; Gimenez-Sanders MA; Soukiazian A; Breaux AC; Skinner K; Shayne M; Soukiazian N; Ling M; Hicks DG
Cancer Med; 2019 Aug; 8(9):4176-4188. PubMed ID: 31199586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of Oncotype DX recurrence score using deep multi-layer perceptrons in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Baltres A; Al Masry Z; Zemouri R; Valmary-Degano S; Arnould L; Zerhouni N; Devalland C
Breast Cancer; 2020 Sep; 27(5):1007-1016. PubMed ID: 32385567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is Oncotype DX testing informative for breast cancers with low ER expression? A retrospective review from a biomarker testing referral center.
Loggie J; Barnes PJ; Carter MD; Rayson D; Bethune GC
Breast; 2024 Jun; 75():103715. PubMed ID: 38520994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross comparison and prognostic assessment of breast cancer multigene signatures in a large population-based contemporary clinical series.
Vallon-Christersson J; Häkkinen J; Hegardt C; Saal LH; Larsson C; Ehinger A; Lindman H; Olofsson H; Sjöblom T; Wärnberg F; Ryden L; Loman N; Malmberg M; Borg Å; Staaf J
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):12184. PubMed ID: 31434940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.
Press DJ; Ibraheem A; Dolan ME; Goss KH; Conzen S; Huo D
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Feb; 168(1):207-220. PubMed ID: 29181717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The West German Study Group Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype study: a prospective multicenter decision impact study utilizing the Prosigna assay for adjuvant treatment decision-making in estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer.
Wuerstlein R; Sotlar K; Gluz O; Otremba B; von Schumann R; Witzel I; Schindlbeck C; Janni W; Schem C; Bauerfeind I; Hasmueller S; Tesch H; Paulenz A; Ghali N; Orujov E; Kates RE; Cowens W; Hornberger J; Pelz E; Harbeck N
Curr Med Res Opin; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1217-24. PubMed ID: 26971372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancers, HER2 mRNA Levels Correlate Better with Clinicopathologic Features and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score than HER2 Immunohistochemistry.
Tyburski H; Karakas C; Finkelman BS; Turner BM; Zhang H; Hicks DG
Lab Invest; 2024 Mar; 104(3):100309. PubMed ID: 38135156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of 21-Gene Expression Assay on Staging Estrogen Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.
Breaux A; Turner B; Wu X; Rai SN; Riley EC; Mandadi M; Sanders MA
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):e261-e269. PubMed ID: 30509870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adjuvant treatment recommendations for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer by Swiss tumor boards using the 21-gene recurrence score (SAKK 26/10).
Pestalozzi BC; Tausch C; Dedes KJ; Rochlitz C; Zimmermann S; von Moos R; Winterhalder R; Ruhstaller T; Mueller A; Buser K; Borner M; Novak U; Nussbaum CU; Seifert B; Bigler M; Bize V; Vilei SB; Rageth C; Aebi S;
BMC Cancer; 2017 Apr; 17(1):265. PubMed ID: 28407750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Rochester Modified Magee Algorithm (RoMMa): An Outcomes Based Strategy for Clinical Risk-Assessment and Risk-Stratification in ER Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients Being Considered for Oncotype DX
Turner BM; Finkelman BS; Hicks DG; Numbereye N; Moisini I; Dhakal A; Skinner K; Sanders MAG; Wang X; Shayne M; Schiffhauer L; Katerji H; Zhang H
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Jan; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 36765860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncotype DX and Prosigna in breast cancer patients: A comparison study.
Abdelhakam DA; Hanna H; Nassar A
Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 26():100306. PubMed ID: 33444922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Nomogram for Predicting the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score in Women with T1-3N0-1miM0 Hormone Receptor‒Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)‒Negative Breast Cancer.
Lee SB; Kim J; Sohn G; Kim J; Chung IY; Kim HJ; Ko BS; Son BH; Ahn SH; Lee JW; Jung KH
Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 51(3):1073-1085. PubMed ID: 30384581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation Between Oncotype DX, PREDICT and the Nottingham Prognostic Index: Implications for the Management of Early Breast Cancer.
Hillyar C; Rizki H; Abbassi O; Miles-Dua S; Clayton G; Gandamihardja T; Smith S
Cureus; 2020 Apr; 12(4):e7552. PubMed ID: 32382456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ER and PR immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus oncotype DX: implications for breast cancer treatment.
Park MM; Ebel JJ; Zhao W; Zynger DL
Breast J; 2014; 20(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 24261318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
