235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33559699)
1. Early dark cortical band sign on CT for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from fat poor angiomyolipoma and detecting peritumoral pseudocapsule.
Ogawa Y; Morita S; Takagi T; Yoshida K; Tanabe K; Nagashima Y; Nishina Y; Sakai S
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5990-5997. PubMed ID: 33559699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT radiomics for differentiating fat poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dehghani Firouzabadi F; Gopal N; Hasani A; Homayounieh F; Li X; Jones EC; Yazdian Anari P; Turkbey E; Malayeri AA
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0287299. PubMed ID: 37498830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma by texture analysis on CT images.
Yan L; Liu Z; Wang G; Huang Y; Liu Y; Yu Y; Liang C
Acad Radiol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1115-21. PubMed ID: 26031228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Circularity Index on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Helps Distinguish Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analyses of Histologically Proven 257 Small Renal Tumors Less Than 4 cm.
Kang HS; Park JJ
Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 33660463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion.
Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Triphasic and epithelioid minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative CEUS characteristics and distinguishing features.
Lu Q; Li CX; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Wang WP
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Feb; 40(2):333-42. PubMed ID: 25139641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can whole-tumor radiomics-based CT analysis better differentiate fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell caricinoma: compared with conventional CT analysis?
Ma Y; Cao F; Xu X; Ma W
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Aug; 45(8):2500-2507. PubMed ID: 31980867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of quantitative CT texture analysis in differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from clear cell renal cell carcinoma on four-phase contrast-enhanced CT images.
You MW; Kim N; Choi HJ
Clin Radiol; 2019 Jul; 74(7):547-554. PubMed ID: 31010583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A CT-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from homogeneous clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Nie P; Yang G; Wang Z; Yan L; Miao W; Hao D; Wu J; Zhao Y; Gong A; Cui J; Jia Y; Niu H
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):1274-1284. PubMed ID: 31506816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT.
Kim SH; Kim CS; Kim MJ; Cho JY; Cho SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):W21-8. PubMed ID: 26700359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat from small clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using specific region of interest on contrast-enhanced CT: a new combination of quantitative tools.
Wang X; Song G; Jiang H
Cancer Imaging; 2021 Jul; 21(1):47. PubMed ID: 34225784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT.
Zhang YY; Luo S; Liu Y; Xu RT
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 23321146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation between fat-poor angiomyolipoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma: qualitative and quantitative analysis using arterial spin labeling MR imaging.
Ye J; Xu Q; Wang SA; Zheng J; Zhu QQ; Dou WQ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Feb; 45(2):512-519. PubMed ID: 31705246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Biexponential and Monoexponential Model of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Common Renal Cell Carcinoma and Fat Poor Angiomyolipoma.
Ding Y; Zeng M; Rao S; Chen C; Fu C; Zhou J
Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(6):853-863. PubMed ID: 27833401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and lipid-poor angiomyolipoma by unenhanced, nephrographic, and delayed phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Ishigami K; Pakalniskis MG; Leite LV; Lee DK; Holanda DG; Rajput M
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 25457535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity ratio curve analysis of small renal masses on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Moriyama S; Yoshida S; Tanaka H; Tanaka H; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Saito K; Kihara K; Fujii Y
Int J Urol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):554-560. PubMed ID: 29577440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
