These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33560712)

  • 41. Prevalence of Out-Of-Pocket Payments for Mammography Screening Among Recently Screened Women.
    Sabatino SA; Thompson TD; Miller JW; Breen N; White MC; Breslau E; Shoemaker ML
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Jul; 28(7):910-918. PubMed ID: 30265611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.
    Sharma N; McMahon M; Haigh I; Chen Y; Dall BJG
    Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30888932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Breast cancer screening in women with and without implants: retrospective study comparing digital mammography to digital mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Perry RE; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Lesslie MD; Gerlach KE; Sun J; Srinivasan A; Leung JWT
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9499-9510. PubMed ID: 34014380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway.
    Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lång K; Albertsen JL; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Sahlberg KK; Skaane P; Suhrke P; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 31821118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.
    Moshina N; Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Haldorsen IS; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32930649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
    Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography alone for Japanese women.
    Ban K; Tsunoda H; Togashi S; Kawaguchi Y; Sato T; Takahashi Y; Nagatsuka Y
    Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):459-464. PubMed ID: 33165757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Out-of-Pocket Costs of Diagnostic Breast Imaging Services After Screening Mammography Among Commercially Insured Women From 2010 to 2017.
    Lowry KP; Bell S; Fendrick AM; Carlos RC
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121347. PubMed ID: 34402892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evolution of breast cancer screening in the Medicare population: clinical and economic implications.
    Killelea BK; Long JB; Chagpar AB; Ma X; Wang R; Ross JS; Gross CP
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Aug; 106(8):. PubMed ID: 25031307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impact of breast density on diagnostic accuracy in digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: results from a European screening trial.
    Olinder J; Johnson K; Åkesson A; Förnvik D; Zackrisson S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2023 Oct; 25(1):116. PubMed ID: 37794480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mammographic Screening in Routine Practice: Multisite Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screenings.
    Conant EF; Talley MM; Parghi CR; Sheh BC; Liang SY; Pohlman S; Rane A; Jung Y; Stevens LAS; Paulus JK; Alsheik N
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(3):e221571. PubMed ID: 36916891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists.
    Gao Y; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28188043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Performance Goals for an Adjunct Diagnostic Test to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies After Screening Mammography: Analysis of Costs, Benefits, and Consequences.
    Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R81-R88. PubMed ID: 27814820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
    Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and ultrasound: which should be used for the different breast densities in breast cancer screening?
    Starikov A; Drotman M; Hentel K; Katzen J; Min RJ; Arleo EK
    Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 26549432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.
    Hofvind S; Moshina N; Holen ÅS; Danielsen AS; Lee CI; Houssami N; Aase HS; Akslen LA; Haldorsen IS
    Radiology; 2021 Jul; 300(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 33973840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.