157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33561727)
1. Partial attribute attendance in environmental choice experiments: A comparative case study between Guangzhou (China) and Brussels (Belgium).
Hua J; Chen WY; Liekens I; Cho FHT
J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112107. PubMed ID: 33561727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating willingness-to-pay for health care: A discrete choice experiment accounting for non-attendance to the cost attribute.
Sever I; Verbič M; Sever EK
J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Oct; 25(5):843-849. PubMed ID: 30677196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental information disclosure and public choice decisions for urban river restoration: A comparative study between Brussels (Belgium) and Guangzhou (China).
Chen WY; Su Y; Liekens I
J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 319():115692. PubMed ID: 35820306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin's impression.
Khan SU; Liu G; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Khan AA; Ali MAS; Misbahullah
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3100-3112. PubMed ID: 31838703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.
Xiao J; Wang F; Wang M; Ma Z
Health Expect; 2022 Jun; 25(3):959-970. PubMed ID: 35049117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying Societal Preferences for River Restoration in a Densely Populated Urban Environment: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Central Brussels.
Chen WY; Liekens I; Broekx S
Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 60(2):263-279. PubMed ID: 28477238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accounting for Attribute-Level Non-Attendance in a Health Choice Experiment: Does it Matter?
Erdem S; Campbell D; Hole AR
Health Econ; 2015 Jul; 24(7):773-89. PubMed ID: 24798402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does location of the households' matters? Identifying the households' willingness to pay and preference heterogeneity in advancement of vulnerable ecosystem services: An approach of choice experiment.
Ali MAS; Zhang Z; Khan SU; Khan AA; Musa M; Rahman P; Hayat Y
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(11):29859-29873. PubMed ID: 36422782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrete choice analysis of health worker job preferences in Ethiopia: Separating attribute non-attendance from taste heterogeneity.
Arora N; Quaife M; Hanson K; Lagarde M; Woldesenbet D; Seifu A; Crastes Dit Sourd R
Health Econ; 2022 May; 31(5):806-819. PubMed ID: 35178825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems.
Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Fahad S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):25247-25261. PubMed ID: 31256403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating Attribute-Specific Willingness-to-Pay Values from a Health Care Contingent Valuation Study: A Best-Worst Choice Approach.
Sever I; Verbič M; Klaric Sever E
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2020 Feb; 18(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 31562593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ecological degradation of an inland river basin and an evaluation of the spatial and distance effect on willingness to pay for its improvement.
Khan I; Zhao M; Khan SU
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(31):31474-31485. PubMed ID: 30203347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Level Overlap and Color Coding on Attribute Non-Attendance in Discrete Choice Experiments.
Jonker MF; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW; Stolk EA
Value Health; 2018 Jul; 21(7):767-771. PubMed ID: 30005748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Would a simple attention-reminder in discrete choice experiments affect heuristics, preferences, and willingness to pay for livestock market facilities?
Kassie GT; Zeleke F; Birhanu MY; Scarpa R
PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270917. PubMed ID: 35802699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Environmental amenities of urban rivers and residential property values: A global meta-analysis.
Chen WY; Li X; Hua J
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 693():133628. PubMed ID: 31377374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. To pay or not to pay? Cost information processing in the valuation of publicly funded healthcare.
Genie MG; Ryan M; Krucien N
Soc Sci Med; 2021 May; 276():113822. PubMed ID: 33752103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation.
Tian Y; Wu H; Zhang G; Wang L; Zheng D; Li S
J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110140. PubMed ID: 32090834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating attribute non-attendance and its consequences in choice experiments with latent class models.
Lagarde M
Health Econ; 2013 May; 22(5):554-67. PubMed ID: 22517664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems.
Heidenreich S; Watson V; Ryan M; Phimister E
Health Econ; 2018 Jan; 27(1):157-171. PubMed ID: 28620975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
