BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33562175)

  • 1. Machine Learning and Simulation-Optimization Coupling for Water Distribution Network Contamination Source Detection.
    Grbčić L; Kranjčević L; Družeta S
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33562175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Machine Learning-based Algorithm for Water Network Contamination Source Localization.
    Grbčić L; Lučin I; Kranjčević L; Družeta S
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 32375289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine-Learning Classification of a Number of Contaminant Sources in an Urban Water Network.
    Lučin I; Grbčić L; Čarija Z; Kranjčević L
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 33401513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computationally efficient approach for identification of fuzzy dynamic groundwater sampling network.
    Kumari K; Jain S; Dhar A
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Apr; 191(5):310. PubMed ID: 31030264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contamination source identification in water distribution networks using convolutional neural network.
    Sun L; Yan H; Xin K; Tao T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(36):36786-36797. PubMed ID: 31745764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating fuzzy logic with Pearson correlation to optimize contaminant detection in water distribution system with uncertainty analyses.
    Osmani SA; Banik BK; Ali H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jun; 191(7):441. PubMed ID: 31203453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying and Estimating the Location of Sources of Industrial Pollution in the Sewage Network.
    Buras MP; Solano Donado F
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34069087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-time identification of indoor pollutant source positions based on neural network locator of contaminant sources and optimized sensor networks.
    Vukovic V; Tabares-Velasco PC; Srebric J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Sep; 60(9):1034-48. PubMed ID: 20863049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selecting the best location of water quality sensors in water distribution networks by considering the importance of nodes and contaminations using NSGA-III (case study: Zahedan water distribution network, Iran).
    Harif S; Azizyan G; Dehghani Darmian M; Givehchi M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):53229-53252. PubMed ID: 36853532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contaminant dispersion prediction and source estimation with integrated Gaussian-machine learning network model for point source emission in atmosphere.
    Ma D; Zhang Z
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Jul; 311():237-45. PubMed ID: 27035273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contaminant source identification using semi-supervised machine learning.
    Vesselinov VV; Alexandrov BS; O'Malley D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 May; 212():134-142. PubMed ID: 29174719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pollution source localization in an urban water supply network based on dynamic water demand.
    Yan X; Zhu Z; Li T
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jun; 26(18):17901-17910. PubMed ID: 29079984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Groundwater contamination sources identification based on kernel extreme learning machine and its effect due to wavelet denoising technique.
    Li J; Lu W; Wang H; Bai Y; Fan Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Sep; 27(27):34107-34120. PubMed ID: 32557044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recharging Schedule for Mitigating Data Loss in Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Network.
    Liu H; Deng Q; Tian S; Peng X; Pei T
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jul; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 29996557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gated graph neural networks for identifying contamination sources in water distribution systems.
    Li Z; Liu H; Zhang C; Fu G
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 351():119806. PubMed ID: 38118345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A robust approach for iterative contaminant source location and release history recovery.
    Sun AY; Painter SL; Wittmeyer GW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Dec; 88(3-4):181-96. PubMed ID: 16889871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An almost-parameter-free harmony search algorithm for groundwater pollution source identification.
    Jiang S; Zhang Y; Wang P; Zheng M
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(11):2359-66. PubMed ID: 24334883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radial basis function network training using a nonsymmetric partition of the input space and particle swarm optimization.
    Alexandridis A; Chondrodima E; Sarimveis H
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Feb; 24(2):219-30. PubMed ID: 24808277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonnegative tensor factorization for contaminant source identification.
    Vesselinov VV; Alexandrov BS; O'Malley D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Jan; 220():66-97. PubMed ID: 30528243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Data-Based Framework for Identifying a Source Location of a Contaminant Spill in a River System with Random Measurement Errors.
    Kim JH; Lee ML; Park C
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Aug; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 31374862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.