These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies. Rodríguez Socarrás ME; Gomez Rivas J; Cuadros Rivera V; Reinoso Elbers J; Llanes González L; Michel Mercado I; Fernandez Del Alamo J; Juarez Del Dago P; Sancha FG J Urol; 2020 Oct; 204(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 32314932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy. Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of the Barcelona-MRI predictive model when PI-RADS v2.1 is used with trans-perineal prostate biopsies. Morote J; Paesano N; Picola N; Muñoz-Rodriguez J; Ruiz-Plazas X; Muñoz-Rivero MV; Celma A; García-de Manuel G; Miró B; Servian P; Abascal JM Int Braz J Urol; 2024; 50(5):595-604. PubMed ID: 39106115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans. Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Confirmatory biopsy of men under active surveillance: extended versus saturation versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy. Pepe P; Cimino S; Garufi A; Priolo G; Russo GI; Giardina R; Reale G; Pennisi M; Morgia G Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 28513296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool. Gaziev G; Wadhwa K; Barrett T; Koo BC; Gallagher FA; Serrao E; Frey J; Seidenader J; Carmona L; Warren A; Gnanapragasam V; Doble A; Kastner C BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 25099182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of free-hand transperineal targeted prostate biopsy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion in Chinese men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Lian H; Zhuang J; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Li D; Fu Y; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H BMC Urol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28679370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer. Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Value of MRI/ultrasound fusion in primary biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer]. Distler F; Radtke JP; Kesch C; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Roth W; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik B Urologe A; 2016 Feb; 55(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 26556268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Diagnostic significance of multiparametric MRI combined with US-fusion guided biopsy of the prostate in patients with increased PSA levels and negative standard biopsy results to detect significant prostate cancer - Correlation with the Gleason score. Korrelation mit dem Gleason Score]. Hoffmann MA; Wieler HJ; Jakobs FM; Taymoorian K; Gerhards A; Miederer M; Schreckenberger M Nuklearmedizin; 2017 Aug; 56(4):147-155. PubMed ID: 28715042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic Accuracy and Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted and Template Systematic Prostate Biopsy Based on Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Noh TI; Tae JH; Kim HK; Shim JS; Kang SG; Sung DJ; Cheon J; Lee JG; Kang SH Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jul; 52(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 32054151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study. Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of free-hand transperineal mpMRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy with transperineal 12-core systematic biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a single-center prospective study in China. Zhang Q; Wang W; Zhang B; Shi J; Fu Y; Li D; Guo S; Zhang S; Huang H; Jiang X; Zhou W; Guo H Int Urol Nephrol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 28005230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions. Yaxley AJ; Yaxley JW; Thangasamy IA; Ballard E; Pokorny MR BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120 Suppl 3():43-50. PubMed ID: 28749035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy. Stonier T; Simson N; Shah T; Lobo N; Amer T; Lee SM; Bass E; Chau E; Grey A; McCartan N; Acher P; Ahmad I; Arumainayagam N; Brown D; Chapman A; Elf D; Hartington T; Ibrahim I; Leung H; Liyanage S; Lovegrove C; Malthouse T; Mateen B; Mistry K; Morrison I; Nalagatla S; Persad R; Pope A; Sokhi H; Syed H; Tadtayev S; Tharmaratnam M; Qteishat A; Miah S; Emberton M; Moore C; Walton T; Eddy B; Ahmed HU Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 33046412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Determination of Gleason score discrepancy for risk stratification in magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy. Kim SH Acta Radiol; 2020 Aug; 61(8):1134-1142. PubMed ID: 31825763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]