These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33563847)

  • 21. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites.
    Koh R; Neiva G; Dennison J; Yaman P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 18264536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effects of Toothbrush Wear on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Resin Composites with Various Types of Matrices.
    AlAli M; Silikas N; Satterthwaite J
    Dent J (Basel); 2021 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 33445457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on surface properties of universal single shade resin-based composites.
    Alharbi G; Al Nahedh HN; Al-Saud LM; Shono N; Maawadh A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):197. PubMed ID: 38326838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems.
    St-Georges AJ; Bolla M; Fortin D; Muller-Bolla M; Thompson JY; Stamatiades PJ
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 16268393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material.
    Barakah HM; Taher NM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 24721503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Ohmiti K; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2010 Apr; 26(4):306-19. PubMed ID: 20036418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system.
    da Costa JB; Goncalves F; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 21702670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Isolated effect of filler particle size on surface properties of experimental resin composites before and after toothbrush abrasion.
    Kobayashi M; Koi K; Wiskoski S; Watanabe H; Lewis S; Ferracane JL
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1286-1292. PubMed ID: 37449726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and gloss of different resin composites.
    Lippert VF; Bresciani E; Mota EG; Bittencourt HR; Kramer PF; Spohr AM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):785-795. PubMed ID: 38130085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Surface roughness, gloss and sequential polishing times of various chairside computer aided design/manufacturing restorative materials].
    Luo H; Tian FC; Wang XY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2022 Jun; 54(3):565-571. PubMed ID: 35701137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Initial polishing time affects gloss retention in resin composites.
    Waheeb N; Silikas N; Watts D
    Am J Dent; 2012 Oct; 25(5):303-6. PubMed ID: 23243980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of contemporary finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of bulk fill resin composite and nanocomposites.
    Gömleksiz S; Gömleksiz O
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Sep; 34(6):915-923. PubMed ID: 35076168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface characteristics of posterior composites after polishing and toothbrushing.
    van Dijken JW; Ruyter IE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1987 Oct; 45(5):337-46. PubMed ID: 3478939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Visually acceptable gloss threshold for resin composite and polishing systems.
    da Costa JB; Ferracane JL; Amaya-Pajares S; Pfefferkorn F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2021 May; 152(5):385-392. PubMed ID: 33549304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Attar N; Aksoy G
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18335732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Surface roughness and gloss of novel flowable composites after polishing and simulated brushing wear].
    Wang RL; Yuan CY; Pan YX; Tian FC; Wang ZH; Wang XY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 52(4):243-247. PubMed ID: 28412791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multitechnique approach.
    Pala K; Tekçe N; Tuncer S; Serim ME; Demirci M
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 27041019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites.
    Scheibe KG; Almeida KG; Medeiros IS; Costa JF; Alves CM
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 19148401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.