These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33564201)

  • 1. Knowledge, behaviour, and policy: questioning the epistemic presuppositions of applying behavioural science in public policymaking.
    Małecka M
    Synthese; 2021; 199(1-2):5311-5338. PubMed ID: 33564201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.
    Boon M; Van Baalen S
    Eur J Philos Sci; 2019; 9(1):16. PubMed ID: 30873248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does environmental science crowd out non-epistemic values?
    Gillette K; Inkpen SA; DesRoches CT
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Jun; 87():81-92. PubMed ID: 34111825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What concept analysis in philosophy of science should be (and why competing philosophical analyses of gene concepts cannot be tested by polling scientists).
    Waters CK
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2004; 26(1):29-58. PubMed ID: 15791805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Questions regarding 'epistemic injustice' in knowledge-intensive policymaking: Two examples from Dutch health insurance policy.
    Moes F; Houwaart E; Delnoij D; Horstman K
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jan; 245():112674. PubMed ID: 31756627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The benefits of acquiring interactional expertise: Why (some) philosophers of science should engage scientific communities.
    Plaisance KS
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2020 Oct; 83():53-62. PubMed ID: 32958281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Qualitative science policy.
    Mitcham C
    Qual Health Res; 2007 Dec; 17(10):1434-41. PubMed ID: 18000082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value-entanglement and the integrity of scientific research.
    Resnik DB; Elliott KC
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():1-11. PubMed ID: 31426942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The mind-brain problem (I): onto-epistemological foundations].
    Goni-Saez F; Tirapu-Ustarroz J
    Rev Neurol; 2016 Aug; 63(3):130-9. PubMed ID: 27412020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Philosophical import of non-epistemic values in clinical trials and data interpretation.
    Varghese J
    Hist Philos Life Sci; 2019 Mar; 41(2):14. PubMed ID: 30900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Théodule Ribot's ambiguous positivism: philosophical and epistemological strategies in the founding of French scientific psychology.
    Guillin V
    J Hist Behav Sci; 2004; 40(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 15048667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A brief philosophical encounter with science and medicine.
    Karbasizadeh AE
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2013 Aug; 1(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 24596845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Was Sir William Crookes epistemically virtuous?
    Kidd IJ
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Dec; 48 Pt A():67-74. PubMed ID: 25091260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are randomised controlled trials positivist? Reviewing the social science and philosophy literature to assess positivist tendencies of trials of social interventions in public health and health services.
    Bonell C; Moore G; Warren E; Moore L
    Trials; 2018 Apr; 19(1):238. PubMed ID: 29673378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inevitability, contingency, and epistemic humility.
    Kidd IJ
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Feb; 55():12-9. PubMed ID: 26774064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19.
    Ruggeri K; Stock F; Haslam SA; Capraro V; Boggio P; Ellemers N; Cichocka A; Douglas KM; Rand DG; van der Linden S; Cikara M; Finkel EJ; Druckman JN; Wohl MJA; Petty RE; Tucker JA; Shariff A; Gelfand M; Packer D; Jetten J; Van Lange PAM; Pennycook G; Peters E; Baicker K; Crum A; Weeden KA; Napper L; Tabri N; Zaki J; Skitka L; Kitayama S; Mobbs D; Sunstein CR; Ashcroft-Jones S; Todsen AL; Hajian A; Verra S; Buehler V; Friedemann M; Hecht M; Mobarak RS; Karakasheva R; Tünte MR; Yeung SK; Rosenbaum RS; Lep Ž; Yamada Y; Hudson STJ; Macchia L; Soboleva I; Dimant E; Geiger SJ; Jarke H; Wingen T; Berkessel JB; Mareva S; McGill L; Papa F; Većkalov B; Afif Z; Buabang EK; Landman M; Tavera F; Andrews JL; Bursalıoğlu A; Zupan Z; Wagner L; Navajas J; Vranka M; Kasdan D; Chen P; Hudson KR; Novak LM; Teas P; Rachev NR; Galizzi MM; Milkman KL; Petrović M; Van Bavel JJ; Willer R
    Nature; 2024 Jan; 625(7993):134-147. PubMed ID: 38093007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What counts as relevant criticism? Longino's critical contextual empiricism and the feminist criticism of mainstream economics.
    Lari T
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2024 Apr; 104():88-97. PubMed ID: 38493739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An engineering paradigm in the biomedical sciences: Knowledge as epistemic tool.
    Boon M
    Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2017 Oct; 129():25-39. PubMed ID: 28389261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Policymakers' Research Capacities, Engagement, and Use of Research in Public Health Policymaking.
    Loncarevic N; Andersen PT; Leppin A; Bertram M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybrid regimes of knowledge? Challenges for constructing scientific evidence in the context of the GMO-debate.
    Böschen S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jul; 16(5):508-20. PubMed ID: 19452181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.