These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33565044)
21. Declines in tobacco brand recognition and ever-smoking rates among young children following restrictions on tobacco advertisements in Hong Kong. Fielding R; Chee YY; Choi KM; Chu TK; Kato K; Lam SK; Sin KL; Tang KT; Wong HM; Wong KM J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Mar; 26(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15044569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Advertising of food to children: is brand logo recognition related to their food knowledge, eating behaviours and food preferences? Kopelman CA; Roberts LM; Adab P J Public Health (Oxf); 2007 Dec; 29(4):358-67. PubMed ID: 17998259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Influence of the Consumer Ethnocentrism and Cultural Familiarity on Brand Preference: Evidence of Event-Related Potential (ERP). Ma Q; Abdeljelil HM; Hu L Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():220. PubMed ID: 31333433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Letter position coding across modalities: the case of Braille readers. Perea M; García-Chamorro C; Martín-Suesta M; Gómez P PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e45636. PubMed ID: 23071522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Novel participatory methods of involving patients in research: naming and branding a longitudinal cohort study, BRIGHTLIGHT. Taylor RM; Mohain J; Gibson F; Solanki A; Whelan J; Fern LA BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():20. PubMed ID: 25888163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Framed or Unframed? An empirical study of the impact of food brand logo frame on consumers' food preferences. Zou H; Wang H; Li J Food Res Int; 2023 Apr; 166():112602. PubMed ID: 36914326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rapid response learning of brand logo priming: Evidence that brand priming is not dominated by rapid response learning. Boehm SG; Smith C; Muench N; Noble K; Atherton C Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1807-1816. PubMed ID: 28856966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The influence of children's reading ability on initial letter position encoding during a reading-like task. Pagán A; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1186-1203. PubMed ID: 33539168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Conscious, but not unconscious, logo priming of brands and related words. Brintazzoli G; Soetens E; Deroost N; Van den Bussche E Conscious Cogn; 2012 Jun; 21(2):824-34. PubMed ID: 22503412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Confusing confusability: on the problems of using psychophysical measures of letter confusability in neuropsychological research. Starrfelt R; Lindegaard M; Bundesen C Cogn Neuropsychol; 2015; 32(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 26165722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Overcoming the effect of letter confusability in letter-by-letter reading: a rehabilitation study. Harris L; Olson A; Humphreys G Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2013; 23(3):429-62. PubMed ID: 23452100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Brand advertising and brand sharing of alcoholic and non-alcoholic products, and the effects on young Thai people's attitudes towards alcohol use: A qualitative focus group study. Kaewpramkusol R; Senior K; Nanthamongkolchai S; Chenhall R Drug Alcohol Rev; 2019 Mar; 38(3):284-293. PubMed ID: 30740803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Color preference and familiarity in performance on brand logo recall. Huang KC; Lin CC; Chiang SY Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):587-96. PubMed ID: 19093619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Apple of the mind's eye: Everyday attention, metamemory, and reconstructive memory for the Apple logo. Blake AB; Nazarian M; Castel AD Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):858-65. PubMed ID: 25721103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Skilled readers show different serial-position effects for letter versus non-letter target detection in mixed-material strings. Schmitt A; Lachmann T Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103025. PubMed ID: 32088389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Brand name confusion: Subjective and objective measures of orthographic similarity. Burt JS; McFarlane KA; Kelly SJ; Humphreys MS; Weatherall K; Burrell RG J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):320-335. PubMed ID: 28541076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of Hebrew letter names in early literacy: the case of multiphonemic acrophonic names. Levin I J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 Dec; 98(4):193-216. PubMed ID: 17949738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The hard-won benefits of familiarity in visual search: naturally familiar brand logos are found faster. Qin XA; Koutstaal W; Engel SA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):914-30. PubMed ID: 24510424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition? Perea M; Marcet A; Fernández-López M Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2295-2300. PubMed ID: 29392634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Australian experience following plain packaging: the impact on tobacco branding. Greenland SJ Addiction; 2016 Dec; 111(12):2248-2258. PubMed ID: 27557863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]