These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33565236)

  • 1. Some design considerations incorporating early futility for single-arm clinical trials with time-to-event primary endpoints using Weibull distribution.
    Waleed M; He J; Phadnis MA
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):610-644. PubMed ID: 33565236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal futility stopping boundaries for binary endpoints.
    Freitag MM; Li X; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):80. PubMed ID: 38539108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size reestimation and Bayesian predictive probability for single-arm clinical trials with a time-to-event endpoint using Weibull distribution with unknown shape parameter.
    Waleed M; He J; Phadnis MA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):469-487. PubMed ID: 37545144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stochastic curtailment tests for phase II trial with time-to-event outcome using the concept of relative time in the case of non-proportional hazards.
    Sharma P; Phadnis MA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):596-611. PubMed ID: 37574976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Over-accrual in Bayesian adaptive trials with continuous futility stopping.
    Barrado LG; Burzykowski T
    Clin Trials; 2023 Jun; 20(3):252-260. PubMed ID: 36803007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interim evaluation of efficacy or futility in group-sequential trials with multiple co-primary endpoints.
    Asakura K; Hamasaki T; Evans SR
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):703-731. PubMed ID: 27757980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Upstrapping to determine futility: predicting future outcomes nonparametrically from past data.
    Wild JL; Ginde AA; Lindsell CJ; Kaizer AM
    Trials; 2024 May; 25(1):312. PubMed ID: 38725072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choice of futility boundaries for group sequential designs with two endpoints.
    Schüler S; Kieser M; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):119. PubMed ID: 28789615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of futility monitoring guidelines using completed phase III oncology trials.
    Zhang Q; Freidlin B; Korn EL; Halabi S; Mandrekar S; Dignam JJ
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 27590208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint.
    Li X; Herrmann C; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):274. PubMed ID: 33153438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do we need to adjust for interim analyses in a Bayesian adaptive trial design?
    Ryan EG; Brock K; Gates S; Slade D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):150. PubMed ID: 32522284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Group sequential adaptive designs in series of time-to-event randomised trials in rare diseases: A simulation study.
    Bayar MA; Le Teuff G; Koenig F; Le Deley MC; Michiels S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jun; 29(6):1483-1498. PubMed ID: 31354106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal timing for an accelerated interim futility analysis incorporating real world data.
    Haine LMF; Murray TA; Koopmeiners JS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2024 May; 140():107489. PubMed ID: 38461938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian adaptive design for pediatric clinical trials incorporating a community of prior beliefs.
    Wang Y; Travis J; Gajewski B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):118. PubMed ID: 35448963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of futility in clinical trials.
    Snapinn S; Chen MG; Jiang Q; Koutsoukos T
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 17128426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive treatment allocation and selection in multi-arm clinical trials: a Bayesian perspective.
    Arjas E; Gasbarra D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):50. PubMed ID: 35184731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Designs for clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes based on stopping guidelines for lack of benefit.
    Royston P; Barthel FM; Parmar MK; Choodari-Oskooei B; Isham V
    Trials; 2011 Mar; 12():81. PubMed ID: 21418571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A flexible futility monitoring method with time-varying conditional power boundary.
    Ying Zhang ; Clarke WR
    Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 20423927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian sequential design with binary outcome.
    Zhu H; Yu Q; Mercante DE
    Pharm Stat; 2017 May; 16(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 28251815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interim futility analysis with intermediate endpoints.
    Goldman B; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.