174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33566638)
1. Practice Patterns and Challenges of Performing and Interpreting Prostate MRI: A Survey by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease-Focused Panel.
Chang SD; Margolis DJA; Turkbey B; Arnold AA; Verma S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):952-959. PubMed ID: 33566638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiologists' preferences regarding content of prostate MRI reports: a survey of the Society of Abdominal Radiology.
Spilseth B; Margolis DJ; Ghai S; Patel NU; Rosenkrantz AB
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jul; 43(7):1807-1812. PubMed ID: 29128994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging Facilities' Adherence to PI-RADS v2 Minimum Technical Standards for the Performance of Prostate MRI.
Esses SJ; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Acad Radiol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 29107458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate MRI: access to and current practice of prostate MRI in the United States.
Leake JL; Hardman R; Ojili V; Thompson I; Shanbhogue A; Hernandez J; Barentsz J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24389134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel.
Westphalen AC; McCulloch CE; Anaokar JM; Arora S; Barashi NS; Barentsz JO; Bathala TK; Bittencourt LK; Booker MT; Braxton VG; Carroll PR; Casalino DD; Chang SD; Coakley FV; Dhatt R; Eberhardt SC; Foster BR; Froemming AT; Fütterer JJ; Ganeshan DM; Gertner MR; Mankowski Gettle L; Ghai S; Gupta RT; Hahn ME; Houshyar R; Kim C; Kim CK; Lall C; Margolis DJA; McRae SE; Oto A; Parsons RB; Patel NU; Pinto PA; Polascik TJ; Spilseth B; Starcevich JB; Tammisetti VS; Taneja SS; Turkbey B; Verma S; Ward JF; Warlick CA; Weinberger AR; Yu J; Zagoria RJ; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 32315265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI of the Prostate in Germany: Online Survey among Radiologists.
Mueller-Lisse UG; Lewerich B; Mueller-Lisse UL; Reiser M; Scherr MK
Rofo; 2015 Aug; 187(8):703-11. PubMed ID: 26069149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.
Lin WC; Muglia VF; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Westphalen AC
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151056. PubMed ID: 27007818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate at 1.5-T without endorectal coil using an 8 channel pelvic phased array: Is it still a viable option?
Pierro A; Di Marco M; Piacentini M; Astore C; Maselli G; Guerriero M; Di Lallo A; Sallustio G; Marcellino A; Cilla S
Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):459-463. PubMed ID: 33148474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interreader variability in prostate MRI reporting using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1.
Brembilla G; Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Damascelli A; Brunetti L; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Schiani E; Venturini E; Grippaldi D; Mendola V; Rancoita PMV; Esposito A; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A; De Cobelli F
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jun; 30(6):3383-3392. PubMed ID: 32052171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard.
Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Arsov C; Lanzman RS; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Antoch G; Albers P; Blondin D
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3185-90. PubMed ID: 23756958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Pantelidou M; Shaida N; Koo B; Caglic I; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200298. PubMed ID: 32479105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the compliance with minimum acceptable technical parameters proposed by PI-RADS v2 guidelines in multiparametric prostate MRI acquisition in tertiary referral hospitals in the Republic of Turkey.
Coşkun M; Sarp AF; Karasu Ş; Gelal MF; Türkbey B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2019 Nov; 25(6):421-427. PubMed ID: 31650967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Population net benefit of prostate MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution contrast-enhanced imaging: A decision curve analysis.
Prabhu V; Rosenkrantz AB; Otazo R; Sodickson DK; Kang SK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1400-1408. PubMed ID: 30629317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can high b-value 3.0 T biparametric MRI with the Simplified Prostate Image Reporting and Data System (S-PI-RADS) be used in biopsy-naïve men?
Wang G; Yu G; Chen J; Yang G; Xu H; Chen Z; Wang G; Bai Z
Clin Imaging; 2022 Aug; 88():80-86. PubMed ID: 34243992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: interpretation using the PI-RADS V2.
Torregrosa Andrés A; Otero García M; Sineiro Galiñanes M
Radiologia; 2017; 59(2):128-138. PubMed ID: 28012730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.
Wahab SA; Verma S
Future Oncol; 2016 Nov; 12(21):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 27646879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate MRI: a national survey of Urologist's attitudes and perceptions.
Manley BJ; Brockman JA; Raup VT; Fowler KJ; Andriole GL
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 27286108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR.
Rosenkrantz AB; Verma S; Choyke P; Eberhardt SC; Eggener SE; Gaitonde K; Haider MA; Margolis DJ; Marks LS; Pinto P; Sonn GA; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 27320841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current beliefs and practice patterns among urologists regarding prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsy.
Muthigi A; Sidana A; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Maruf M; Valayil S; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):32.e1-32.e7. PubMed ID: 27743850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
