175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33566638)
21. Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
Hoffmann R; Logan C; O'Callaghan M; Gormly K; Chan K; Foreman D
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jan; 50(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29188489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A Comparison of Radiologists' and Urologists' Opinions Regarding Prostate MRI Reporting: Results From a Survey of Specialty Societies.
Spilseth B; Ghai S; Patel NU; Taneja SS; Margolis DJ; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 29064758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interobserver Reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A Multicenter Study of Six Experienced Prostate Radiologists.
Rosenkrantz AB; Ginocchio LA; Cornfeld D; Froemming AT; Gupta RT; Turkbey B; Westphalen AC; Babb JS; Margolis DJ
Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 27035179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Audit of cancer yields after prostate MRI using both the PI-RADS version 2 and Likert scoring systems.
Sokhi HK; Wilson A; Pindoria N; McNamara C; Padhani AR; Meer Z; Pope A
Clin Radiol; 2022 Jul; 77(7):541-547. PubMed ID: 35570157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists' training.
de Rooij M; Israël B; Tummers M; Ahmed HU; Barrett T; Giganti F; Hamm B; Løgager V; Padhani A; Panebianco V; Puech P; Richenberg J; Rouvière O; Salomon G; Schoots I; Veltman J; Villeirs G; Walz J; Barentsz JO
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5404-5416. PubMed ID: 32424596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Aneja S; Syed JS; Pahade J; Mathur M; Sprenkle P; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):W218-W225. PubMed ID: 29489409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 1 and version 2 and combination with apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of biopsy outcome.
Ryznarová Z; Keller J; Záleský M; Zachoval R; Čapek V; Malikova H
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2019 Mar; 40(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 31184822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Integration and Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T Nonendorectal coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Context of Active Surveillance.
Curci NE; Lane BR; Shankar PR; Noyes SL; Moriarity AK; Kubat A; Brede C; Montgomery JS; Auffenberg GB; Miller DC; Montie JE; George AK; Davenport MS
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():137-143. PubMed ID: 29653121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI.
Rosenkrantz AB; Lim RP; Haghighi M; Somberg MB; Babb JS; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):W612-8. PubMed ID: 24059400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System Version 2 as a Radiology Performance Metric: An Analysis of 18 Abdominal Radiologists.
Davenport MS; Downs E; George AK; Curci NE; Salka BR; Sullivan TQ; Shankar PR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2021 Aug; 18(8):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 33848507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of "real life" prostate MRI inter-observer variability on total needle samples and indication for biopsy.
Rosenzweig B; Laitman Y; Zilberman DE; Raz O; Ramon J; Dotan ZA; Portnoy O
Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):793.e13-793.e18. PubMed ID: 32303407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer: a national survey of patterns of practice among radiation oncologists in Spain.
Couñago F; Sancho G; Gómez-Iturriaga A; Henríquez I;
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1484-1491. PubMed ID: 29992463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?
Junker D; Steinkohl F; Fritz V; Bektic J; Tokas T; Aigner F; Herrmann TRW; Rieger M; Nagele U
World J Urol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):691-699. PubMed ID: 30078170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [PI-RADS classification: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate].
Röthke M; Blondin D; Schlemmer HP; Franiel T
Rofo; 2013 Mar; 185(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 23404430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of a Structured Reporting Template on Adherence to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 and on the Diagnostic Performance of Prostate MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Shaish H; Feltus W; Steinman J; Hecht E; Wenske S; Ahmed F
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 May; 15(5):749-754. PubMed ID: 29506919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
