157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33567232)
1. A Comparison of Supine Versus Stand-on Bioimpedance Devices to Assess Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Mastick J; Smoot BJ; Paul SM; Kober KM; Hamolsky D; Madden LK; Conley YP; Dixit N; Hammer MJ; Fu MR; Miaskowski C
Lymphat Res Biol; 2021 Dec; 19(6):553-561. PubMed ID: 33567232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Body Positional Effects on Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measurements for Lymphedema Assessment of the Arm.
Koelmeyer LA; Ward LC; Dean C; Boyages J
Lymphat Res Biol; 2020 Oct; 18(5):464-473. PubMed ID: 32027213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Body Positioning When Assessing Lymphedema of the Lower Limb Using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.
Koelmeyer LA; Gaitatzis K; Thompson B; Ward LC
Lymphat Res Biol; 2024 Feb; 22(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 37851985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter-Changeability of Impedance Devices for Lymphedema Assessment.
van Zanten M; Piller N; Ward LC
Lymphat Res Biol; 2016 Jun; 14(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 26574711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Bioimpedance in the Evaluation of Lymphedema Secondary to Treatment of Breast Cancer.
Ferro AP; Ferreira VTK; Rezende MS; de Souza TR; Almeida AM; Guirro RRJ; Guirro ECO
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Jun; 16(3):282-286. PubMed ID: 29252100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Arm Volume Using a Tape Measure Versus a 3D Optical Scanner in Survivors with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Mastick J; Smoot BJ; Paul SM; Kober KM; Cooper BA; Madden LK; Conley YP; Dixit N; Hammer MJ; Fu MR; Piper M; Cate SP; Shepherd J; Miaskowski C
Lymphat Res Biol; 2022 Feb; 20(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 33761290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Seasonal Variation in Upper Limb Size, Volume, Fluid Distribution, and Lymphedema Diagnosis, Following Breast Cancer Treatment.
Phillips J; Witt S; Piller N; Gordon S
Lymphat Res Biol; 2023 Aug; 21(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 36812466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioimpedance spectroscopy is not associated with a clinical diagnosis of breast cancer-related lymphedema.
Spitz JA; Chao AH; Peterson DM; Subramaniam V; Prakash S; Skoracki RJ
Lymphology; 2019; 52(3):134-142. PubMed ID: 31874125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of bioimpedance analysis to evaluate lymphedema.
Warren AG; Janz BA; Slavin SA; Borud LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):541-3. PubMed ID: 17452840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of Bioelectrical Impedance Thresholds for Early Detection of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema.
Liu S; Zhao Q; Ren X; Cui Y; Yang H; Wang S; Liu M; Wang S
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(13):2990-2996. PubMed ID: 34220327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Confirmation of the reference impedance ratios used for assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy.
Ward LC; Dylke E; Czerniec S; Isenring E; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 21417767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of local tissue water in the arms and trunk of breast cancer survivors with and without upper extremity lymphoedema.
Mazor M; Smoot BJ; Mastick J; Mausisa G; Paul SM; Kober KM; Elboim C; Singh K; Conley YP; Mickevicius G; Field J; Hutchison H; Miaskowski C
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2019 Jan; 39(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 30207039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry to Assess Soft Tissue Composition in Breast Cancer Survivors With and Without Lymphedema.
Smoot BJ; Mastick J; Shepherd J; Paul SM; Kober KM; Cooper BA; Conley YP; Dixit N; Hammer MJ; Fu MR; Abrams G; Miaskowski C
Lymphat Res Biol; 2022 Aug; 20(4):391-397. PubMed ID: 34793255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Segmental Bioimpedance Informs Diagnosis of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Svensson BJ; Dylke ES; Ward LC; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(4):349-355. PubMed ID: 28956701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis of upper limb lymphedema: development of an evidence-based approach.
Dylke ES; Schembri GP; Bailey DL; Bailey E; Ward LC; Refshauge K; Beith J; Black D; Kilbreath SL
Acta Oncol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 27333213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Staging Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema with Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.
Ward LC; Koelmeyer LA; Moloney E
Lymphat Res Biol; 2022 Aug; 20(4):398-408. PubMed ID: 34756114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement of bioelectrical resistance, reactance, and phase angle values from supine and standing bioimpedance analyzers.
Dellinger JR; Johnson BA; Benavides ML; Moore ML; Stratton MT; Harty PS; Siedler MR; Tinsley GM
Physiol Meas; 2021 Apr; 42(3):. PubMed ID: 33592586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Interchangeability of Two Electrode Placement Protocols Used by Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Devices in the Detection of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
Paramanandam VS; Daptardar AA; Kamat MV; Lee MJ; Ward LC; Kilbreath SL; Dylke ES
Lymphat Res Biol; 2021 Apr; 19(2):181-188. PubMed ID: 32986508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of bilateral limb lymphedema by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy.
Ward L; Winall A; Isenring E; Hills A; Czerniec S; Dylke E; Kilbreath S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):409-18. PubMed ID: 21270623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioelectrical impedance for detecting upper limb lymphedema in nonlaboratory settings.
Ridner SH; Dietrich MS; Deng J; Bonner CM; Kidd N
Lymphat Res Biol; 2009; 7(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19231915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
