237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33567295)
1. Number space is made by response space: Evidence from left spatial neglect.
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Scozia G; D'Onofrio M; Raffa G; Nigro S; Arnaud CR; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2021 Apr; 154():107773. PubMed ID: 33567295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines.
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Doricchi F
Cognition; 2019 Sep; 190():143-156. PubMed ID: 31079015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.
van Dijck JP; Doricchi F
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30739136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neglect impairs explicit processing of the mental number line.
Zorzi M; Bonato M; Treccani B; Scalambrin G; Marenzi R; Priftis K
Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():125. PubMed ID: 22661935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?
Mapelli D; Rusconi E; Umiltà C
Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B1-10. PubMed ID: 12804817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: simulating 'spatial' neglect in healthy subjects.
Göbel SM; Calabria M; Farnè A; Rossetti Y
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):860-8. PubMed ID: 16260006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How to trigger and keep stable directional Space-Number Associations (SNAs).
Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
Cortex; 2021 Jan; 134():253-264. PubMed ID: 33307270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre-motor deficits in left spatial neglect: An EEG study on Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and response-related beta oscillatory activity.
Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Scozia G; Pellegrino M; D'Onofrio M; Isabella R; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Oct; 147():107572. PubMed ID: 32721497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Left Spatial Neglect Evoked by Electrostimulation of the Right Inferior Fronto-occipital Fasciculus.
Herbet G; Yordanova YN; Duffau H
Brain Topogr; 2017 Nov; 30(6):747-756. PubMed ID: 28660355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No inherent left and right side in human 'mental number line': evidence from right brain damage.
Aiello M; Jacquin-Courtois S; Merola S; Ottaviani T; Tomaiuolo F; Bueti D; Rossetti Y; Doricchi F
Brain; 2012 Aug; 135(Pt 8):2492-505. PubMed ID: 22577222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Explicit versus implicit processing of representational space in neglect: dissociations in accessing the mental number line.
Priftis K; Zorzi M; Meneghello F; Marenzi R; Umiltà C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):680-8. PubMed ID: 16768369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect.
Umiltà C; Priftis K; Zorzi M
Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 18985329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial-numerical associations of manual response codes are strongly asymmetrical.
Richter M; Wühr P
Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105538. PubMed ID: 37413698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Number-space interactions in the human parietal cortex: Enlightening the SNARC effect with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.
Cutini S; Scarpa F; Scatturin P; Dell'Acqua R; Zorzi M
Cereb Cortex; 2014 Feb; 24(2):444-51. PubMed ID: 23081883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the interactions among SNARC effect, finger counting direction and embodied cognition.
Prete G; Tommasi L
PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9155. PubMed ID: 32435547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect).
Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Aiello M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(22):4332-4343. PubMed ID: 30902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
