These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3356814)

  • 21. The effect of noise fluctuation and spectral bandwidth on gap detection.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Ozmeral EJ; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1601. PubMed ID: 27106308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlations among within-channel and between-channel auditory gap-detection thresholds in normal listeners.
    Phillips DP; Smith JC
    Perception; 2004; 33(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 15176620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of signal frequency and absolute bandwidth on gap detection in noise.
    Snell KB; Ison JR; Frisina DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1458-64. PubMed ID: 7963009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2587-92. PubMed ID: 2745882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection of increments and decrements in sinusoids as a function of frequency, increment, and decrement duration and pedestal duration.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Kohlrausch A; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2954-65. PubMed ID: 9373982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detection of decrements and increments in sinusoids at high overall levels.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3669-77. PubMed ID: 8655798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The clinical use of oto-acoustic emissions of cochlear distortion products].
    Hauser R; Probst R; Harris FP
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Mar; 70(3):123-31. PubMed ID: 2036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Fitzgibbons PJ; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):761-5. PubMed ID: 7130534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of level and frequency on the detection of decrements and increments in sinusoids.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3791-9. PubMed ID: 7790657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects: distortion product responses.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Bergman B; Beauchaine KL; Kaminski JR; Peters J; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2050-60. PubMed ID: 8473617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Smoski WJ; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1541-7. PubMed ID: 3711453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interaural time processing when stimulus bandwidth differs at the two ears.
    Brown CA; Yost WA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():247-54. PubMed ID: 23716230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gap detection in hearing-impaired chinchillas.
    Giraudi-Perry DM; Salvi RJ; Henderson D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Nov; 72(5):1387-93. PubMed ID: 7175024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jul; 80(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 3745670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical investigation and mechanism of air-bone gaps in large vestibular aqueduct syndrome.
    Merchant SN; Nakajima HH; Halpin C; Nadol JB; Lee DJ; Innis WP; Curtin H; Rosowski JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2007 Jul; 116(7):532-41. PubMed ID: 17727085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.