These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33569029)

  • 1. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():621251. PubMed ID: 33569029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Sample Size and Various Other Factors on Estimation of Dichotomous Mixture IRT Models.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Jun; 83(3):520-555. PubMed ID: 37187690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured.
    Akbay L; de la Torre J
    Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 31954425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Ravand H; Baghaei P; Doebler P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2930. PubMed ID: 31998189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model Selection for Cogitative Diagnostic Analysis of the Reading Comprehension Test.
    Liu H; Bian Y
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():644764. PubMed ID: 34504454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Xu G; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):625-49. PubMed ID: 26155755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic-Input, Noisy Conjunctive Models for Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Zhan P; Wang WC; Jiao H; Bian Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():997. PubMed ID: 29962994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Growth Modeling in a Diagnostic Classification Model (DCM) Framework-A Multivariate Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Pan Q; Qin L; Kingston N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1714. PubMed ID: 32903674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Semi-supervised Learning-Based Diagnostic Classification Method Using Artificial Neural Networks.
    Xue K; Bradshaw LP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():618336. PubMed ID: 33551928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model and the General Diagnostic Model.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):585-610. PubMed ID: 27230079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
    Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Random Guessing Behaviors.
    Hsu CL; Jin KY; Chiu MM
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():570365. PubMed ID: 33101139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis: The DINO Model and the DINA Model Revisited.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):465-479. PubMed ID: 29881019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving reliability estimation in cognitive diagnosis modeling.
    Kreitchmann RS; de la Torre J; Sorrel MA; Nájera P; Abad FJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3446-3460. PubMed ID: 36127563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Kaplan M; de la Torre J; Barrada JR
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 May; 39(3):167-188. PubMed ID: 29881001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sample Size Requirements for Estimation of Item Parameters in the Multidimensional Graded Response Model.
    Jiang S; Wang C; Weiss DJ
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():109. PubMed ID: 26903916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explanatory Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Incorporating Latent and Observed Predictors.
    Park YS; Xing K; Lee YS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):376-392. PubMed ID: 30034055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consistency Theory for the General Nonparametric Classification Method.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):830-845. PubMed ID: 30725333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.