These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33569684)

  • 1. Presenting a soft sensor for monitoring and controlling well health and pump performance using machine learning, statistical analysis, and Petri net modeling.
    Amini MH; Arab M; Faramarz MG; Ghazikhani A; Gheibi M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 33569684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the performance of decision tree (DT) algorithms and extreme learning machine (ELM) model in the prediction of water quality of the Upper Green River watershed.
    Anmala J; Turuganti V
    Water Environ Res; 2021 Nov; 93(11):2360-2373. PubMed ID: 34528328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using machine learning models to predict the effects of seasonal fluxes on Plesiomonas shigelloides population density.
    Ekundayo TC; Ijabadeniyi OA; Igbinosa EO; Okoh AI
    Environ Pollut; 2023 Jan; 317():120734. PubMed ID: 36455774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based Economic Denial of Sustainability Attack Detection Systems: Cloud Computing Environments.
    Aldhyani THH; Alkahtani H
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust machine learning algorithms for predicting coastal water quality index.
    Uddin MG; Nash S; Mahammad Diganta MT; Rahman A; Olbert AI
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Nov; 321():115923. PubMed ID: 35988401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mapping of groundwater productivity potential with machine learning algorithms: A case study in the provincial capital of Baluchistan, Pakistan.
    Rasool U; Yin X; Xu Z; Rasool MA; Senapathi V; Hussain M; Siddique J; Trabucco JC
    Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135265. PubMed ID: 35691394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for groundwater quality modeling.
    Sahour S; Khanbeyki M; Gholami V; Sahour H; Kahvazade I; Karimi H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(16):46004-46021. PubMed ID: 36715809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Models for Accurate Estimation of Groundwater Nitrate Concentration.
    Band SS; Janizadeh S; Pal SC; Chowdhuri I; Siabi Z; Norouzi A; Melesse AM; Shokri M; Mosavi A
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(20):. PubMed ID: 33053663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep convolutional neural network and IoT technology for healthcare.
    Wassan S; Dongyan H; Suhail B; Jhanjhi NZ; Xiao G; Ahmed S; Murugesan RK
    Digit Health; 2024; 10():20552076231220123. PubMed ID: 38250147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of drought conditions and prediction by machine learning algorithms using Standardized Precipitation Index and Standardized Water-Level Index (case study: Yazd province, Iran).
    Shakeri R; Amini H; Fakheri F; Ketabchi H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(45):101744-101760. PubMed ID: 37656297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do we need different machine learning algorithms for QSAR modeling? A comprehensive assessment of 16 machine learning algorithms on 14 QSAR data sets.
    Wu Z; Zhu M; Kang Y; Leung EL; Lei T; Shen C; Jiang D; Wang Z; Cao D; Hou T
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33313673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Groundwater quality modeling and determining critical points: a comparison of machine learning to Best-Worst Method.
    Nasiri Khiavi A; Mostafazadeh R; Adhami M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Nov; 30(54):115758-115775. PubMed ID: 37889408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Novel Hierarchical Extreme Machine-Learning-Based Approach for Linear Attenuation Coefficient Forecasting.
    Varone G; Ieracitano C; Çiftçioğlu AÖ; Hussain T; Gogate M; Dashtipour K; Al-Tamimi BN; Almoamari H; Akkurt I; Hussain A
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 36832620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Risk Prediction Model for Physical Restraints Among Older Chinese Adults in Long-term Care Facilities: Machine Learning Study.
    Wang J; Chen H; Wang H; Liu W; Peng D; Zhao Q; Xiao M
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e43815. PubMed ID: 37023416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Machine learning-based prediction of hospital prolonged length of stay admission at emergency department: a Gradient Boosting algorithm analysis.
    Zeleke AJ; Palumbo P; Tubertini P; Miglio R; Chiari L
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1179226. PubMed ID: 37588696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time series forecasting of new cases and new deaths rate for COVID-19 using deep learning methods.
    Ayoobi N; Sharifrazi D; Alizadehsani R; Shoeibi A; Gorriz JM; Moosaei H; Khosravi A; Nahavandi S; Gholamzadeh Chofreh A; Goni FA; Klemeš JJ; Mosavi A
    Results Phys; 2021 Aug; 27():104495. PubMed ID: 34221854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting Readmission Charges Billed by Hospitals: Machine Learning Approach.
    Gopukumar D; Ghoshal A; Zhao H
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Aug; 10(8):e37578. PubMed ID: 35896038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of irrigation groundwater quality parameters using ANN, LSTM, and MLR models.
    Kouadri S; Pande CB; Panneerselvam B; Moharir KN; Elbeltagi A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):21067-21091. PubMed ID: 34748181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hybrid air quality early-warning framework: An hourly forecasting model with online sequential extreme learning machines and empirical mode decomposition algorithms.
    Sharma E; Deo RC; Prasad R; Parisi AV
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Mar; 709():135934. PubMed ID: 31869708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms.
    Nhu VH; Shirzadi A; Shahabi H; Singh SK; Al-Ansari N; Clague JJ; Jaafari A; Chen W; Miraki S; Dou J; Luu C; Górski K; Thai Pham B; Nguyen HD; Ahmad BB
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 32316191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.