These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33569690)
1. Risk factors for peristomal skin disorders associated with temporary ileostomy construction. Maeda S; Ouchi A; Komori K; Kinoshita T; Oshiro T; Ito S; Abe T; Shimizu Y Surg Today; 2021 Jul; 51(7):1152-1157. PubMed ID: 33569690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Prassas D; Vossos V; Rehders A; Knoefel WT; Krieg A Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2020 Dec; 405(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 32705343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors preventing restoration of bowel continuity in patients with rectal cancer submitted to anterior rectal resection and protective ileostomy. da-Fonseca LM; Buzatti KCLR; Castro LL; Lacerda Filho A; Correia MITD; da-Silva RG Rev Col Bras Cir; 2019 Jan; 45(6):e1998. PubMed ID: 30624520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Diverting Loop Ileostomy for Patients with Rectal Tumor. Miyo M; Takemasa I; Hata T; Mizushima T; Doki Y; Mori M World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3205-3211. PubMed ID: 28748422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery with temporary ileostomy. Kim MJ; Kim YS; Park SC; Sohn DK; Kim DY; Chang HJ; Oh JH Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):721-7. PubMed ID: 26490725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and Feasibility of Temporary Ileostomy in Older Patients: A Retrospective Study. Maeda S; Ouchi A; Komori K; Kinoshita T; Oshiro T; Numata Y; Ito S; Abe T; Shimizu Y Wound Manag Prev; 2022 Jul; 68(7):18-24. PubMed ID: 35895293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protection of colorectal anastomosis with an intraluminal bypass device for patients undergoing an elective anterior resection: a pilot study. Reshef A; Ben-Arie G; Pinsk I Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Jun; 23(6):565-571. PubMed ID: 31278459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of safety of loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for low-lying rectal cancer patients undergoing anterior resection: A retrospective, single institute, propensity score-matched study. Sun X; Han H; Qiu H; Wu B; Lin G; Niu B; Zhou J; Lu J; Xu L; Zhang G; Xiao Y J BUON; 2019; 24(1):123-129. PubMed ID: 30941960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of a nomogram to predict the closure rate of diverting ileostomy after low anterior resection: A retrospective cohort study. Abe S; Kawai K; Nozawa H; Hata K; Kiyomatsu T; Tanaka T; Nishikawa T; Otani K; Sasaki K; Kaneko M; Murono K; Emoto S; Watanabe T Int J Surg; 2017 Nov; 47():83-88. PubMed ID: 28951289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of specific technical maneuvers utilized in the creation of diverting loop-ileostomies on stoma-related morbidity. Miyo M; Takemasa I; Ikeda M; Tujie M; Hasegawa J; Ohue M; Kato T; Mizushima T; Doki Y; Mori M Surg Today; 2017 Aug; 47(8):940-950. PubMed ID: 28280983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer. Keane C; Park J; Öberg S; Wedin A; Bock D; O'Grady G; Bissett I; Rosenberg J; Angenete E Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):645-652. PubMed ID: 30706439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost analysis in a randomized trial of early closure of a temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial). Park J; Angenete E; Bock D; Correa-Marinez A; Danielsen AK; Gehrman J; Haglind E; Jansen JE; Skullman S; Wedin A; Rosenberg J Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 30911920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of skin bridge loop ileostomy and traditional loop ileostomy in patients with low rectal cancer. Ye H; Huang S; Yu J; Zhou Q; Xi C; Cao L; Wang P; Shen J; Gong Z Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9101. PubMed ID: 33907300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporary vs. permanent stoma: factors associated with the development of complications and costs for rectal cancer patients. Jabbal IS; Spaulding AC; Lemini R; Borkar SR; Stanek K; Colibaseanu DT Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Apr; 37(4):823-833. PubMed ID: 35201413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surgical Techniques and Stoma-related Complications Associated With Emergency Stoma Creation. Shiraishi T; Ogawa H; Naomi S; Shioi I; Shibasaki Y; Ozawa N; Osone K; Okada T; Sano A; Sakai M; Sohda M; Shirabe K; Saeki H Anticancer Res; 2023 Sep; 43(9):4189-4195. PubMed ID: 37648315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors of permanent stomas in patients with rectal cancer after low anterior resection with temporary stomas. Lee CM; Huh JW; Park YA; Cho YB; Kim HC; Yun SH; Lee WY; Chun HK Yonsei Med J; 2015 Mar; 56(2):447-53. PubMed ID: 25683994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-stitch versus traditional method of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection: A retrospective comparative study. Chen Y; Pei W; Wang Q; Wang W; Xu T; Jing C; Li L; Zhang J Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():117-123. PubMed ID: 32650118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic and open surgery for patients undergoing rectal cancer resection with concurrent stoma creation. Goldstone RN; Francone T; Milky G; Shih IF; Bossie H; Li Y; Ricciardi R Surg Endosc; 2024 Aug; 38(8):4550-4558. PubMed ID: 38942946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 'Dumpling suture method' versus traditional suture method of protective loop ileostomy in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with specimen extraction through stoma incision: a retrospective comparative cohort study. Gu J; Wang J; Hu X; Ding W; Cui L; Du P; Liang Z; Wu T Int J Surg; 2024 Mar; 110(3):1367-1375. PubMed ID: 38484258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]