These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33570528)
1. The Use of Modified Polyetheretherketone Post and Core for an Esthetic Lithium Disilicate Anterior Ceramic Restoration: A Clinical Report. Zoidis P Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):120-125. PubMed ID: 33570528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging. Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. Rosentritt M; Fürer C; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 27(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 10931252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores. Dejak B; Młotkowski A J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 28886951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture Resistance and Failure Mode of Custom-made Post-and-cores of Polyetheretherketone and Nano-ceramic Composite. Teixeira KN; Duque TM; Maia HP; Gonçalves T Oper Dent; 2020 Sep; 45(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 32101501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey. Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Delgado A; Donovan TE J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 31703926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance and failure mode of three esthetic CAD-CAM post and core restorations. Fathey IT; Azer AS; Abdelraheem IM BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):523. PubMed ID: 38702708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors. Solomon CS; Osman YI SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress distribution in restorations with glass fiber and polyetheretherketone intraradicular posts: An in silico analysis. Hallak AG; Caldas RA; Silva ID; Miranda ME; Brandt WC; Vitti RP Dent Mater J; 2022 May; 41(3):376-381. PubMed ID: 35135940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study. Butz F; Lennon AM; Heydecke G; Strub JR Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11842907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns. Barbosa-Júnior SA; Pereira GKR; Dapieve KS; Machado PS; Valandro LF; Schuh C; Consani RLX; Bacchi A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. Heydecke G; Butz F; Hussein A; Strub JR J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Apr; 87(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 12011861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary zirconia and mandibular composite resin-lithium disilicate-modified PEEK fixed implant-supported restorations for a completely edentulous patient with an atrophic maxilla and mandible: A clinical report. Cabello-Domínguez G; Pérez-López J; Veiga-López B; González D; Revilla-León M J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):403-410. PubMed ID: 31870613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the use of PEEK material in post-core and crown restorations using finite element analysis. Tekin S; Adiguzel O; Cangul S; Atas O; Erpacal B Am J Dent; 2020 Oct; 33(5):251-257. PubMed ID: 33017528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Helal MA; Wang Z J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations. Hamza TA; Sherif RM J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns. Forberger N; Göhring TN J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations. Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. Vichi A; Ferrari M; Davidson CL J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 10756290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis. Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]