BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33570542)

  • 1. Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
    Eldred-Evans D; Burak P; Connor MJ; Day E; Evans M; Fiorentino F; Gammon M; Hosking-Jervis F; Klimowska-Nassar N; McGuire W; Padhani AR; Prevost AT; Price D; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
    JAMA Oncol; 2021 Mar; 7(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 33570542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Evaluation of Screening Pathways Using a Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen: Results from the IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
    Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor M; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 6(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 37080821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomarker vs MRI-Enhanced Strategies for Prostate Cancer Screening: The STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Björnebo L; Discacciati A; Falagario U; Vigneswaran HT; Jäderling F; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Nordström T; Lantz A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Apr; 7(4):e247131. PubMed ID: 38648061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
    Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeated Prostate Cancer Screening Using Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Secondary Analysis of the STHLM3-MRI Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nordström T; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Clements M; Abbadi A; Grönberg H; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Discacciati A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2354577. PubMed ID: 38324313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Transrectal Ultrasonography Biopsy for Biopsy-Naive Men at Risk for Prostate Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Klotz L; Chin J; Black PC; Finelli A; Anidjar M; Bladou F; Mercado A; Levental M; Ghai S; Chang SD; Milot L; Patel C; Kassam Z; Moore C; Kasivisvanathan V; Loblaw A; Kebabdjian M; Earle CC; Pond GR; Haider MA
    JAMA Oncol; 2021 Apr; 7(4):534-542. PubMed ID: 33538782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
    van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.
    Rannikko A; Leht M; Mirtti T; Kenttämies A; Tolonen T; Rinta-Kiikka I; Kilpeläinen TP; Natunen K; Lilja H; Lehtimäki T; Raitanen J; Kujala P; Ronkainen J; Matikainen M; Petas A; Taari K; Tammela T; Auvinen A
    BJU Int; 2022 Aug; 130(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 34958531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Within the Göteborg Randomised Screening Trial.
    Grenabo Bergdahl A; Wilderäng U; Aus G; Carlsson S; Damber JE; Frånlund M; Geterud K; Khatami A; Socratous A; Stranne J; Hellström M; Hugosson J
    Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):566-573. PubMed ID: 26724840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiparametric ultrasound versus multiparametric MRI to diagnose prostate cancer (CADMUS): a prospective, multicentre, paired-cohort, confirmatory study.
    Grey ADR; Scott R; Shah B; Acher P; Liyanage S; Pavlou M; Omar R; Chinegwundoh F; Patki P; Shah TT; Hamid S; Ghei M; Gilbert K; Campbell D; Brew-Graves C; Arumainayagam N; Chapman A; McLeavy L; Karatziou A; Alsaadi Z; Collins T; Freeman A; Eldred-Evans D; Bertoncelli-Tanaka M; Tam H; Ramachandran N; Madaan S; Winkler M; Arya M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
    Lancet Oncol; 2022 Mar; 23(3):428-438. PubMed ID: 35240084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate Cancer Screening With PSA, Kallikrein Panel, and MRI: The ProScreen Randomized Trial.
    Auvinen A; Tammela TLJ; Mirtti T; Lilja H; Tolonen T; Kenttämies A; Rinta-Kiikka I; Lehtimäki T; Natunen K; Nevalainen J; Raitanen J; Ronkainen J; van der Kwast T; Riikonen J; Pétas A; Matikainen M; Taari K; Kilpeläinen T; Rannikko AS;
    JAMA; 2024 May; 331(17):1452-1459. PubMed ID: 38581254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.
    Mozer P; Rouprêt M; Le Cossec C; Granger B; Comperat E; de Gorski A; Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 24552477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
    Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
    Jayadevan R; Felker ER; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Zhang H; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Marks LS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911019. PubMed ID: 31509206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Targeted vs Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men Who Are Biopsy Naive: The Prospective Assessment of Image Registration in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer (PAIREDCAP) Study.
    Elkhoury FF; Felker ER; Kwan L; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Natarajan S; Marks LS
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Sep; 154(9):811-818. PubMed ID: 31188412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The SmartTarget Biopsy Trial: A Prospective, Within-person Randomised, Blinded Trial Comparing the Accuracy of Visual-registration and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Image-fusion Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification.
    Hamid S; Donaldson IA; Hu Y; Rodell R; Villarini B; Bonmati E; Tranter P; Punwani S; Sidhu HS; Willis S; van der Meulen J; Hawkes D; McCartan N; Potyka I; Williams NR; Brew-Graves C; Freeman A; Moore CM; Barratt D; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
    Eur Urol; 2019 May; 75(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 30527787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prostagram magnetic resonance imaging in a screening population: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System or Likert?
    Mayor N; Eldred-Evans D; Tam H; Sokhi H; Padhani AR; Connor MJ; Price D; Gammon M; Klimowska-Nassar N; Burak P; Day E; Winkler M; Fiorentino F; Shah T; Ahmed HU
    BJU Int; 2024 Jan; 133(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 37591614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.