These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33571250)

  • 1. A double-slit experiment with human subjects.
    Duffy J; Loch-Temzelides T
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246526. PubMed ID: 33571250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.
    Mason W; Suri S
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 21717266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time pressure and the application of decision rules: choices and judgments among multiattribute alternatives.
    Edland A
    Scand J Psychol; 1994 Sep; 35(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 7939490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do the right thing: the assumption of optimality in lay decision theory and causal judgment.
    Johnson SG; Rips LJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Mar; 77():42-76. PubMed ID: 25773909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pseudo-dyadic "interaction" on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.
    Summerville A; Chartier CR
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 23055159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validating a new process tracing method for decision making.
    Jasper JD; Levin IP
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2001 Nov; 33(4):496-512. PubMed ID: 11816453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical concerns arising from recruiting workers from Amazon's Mechanical Turk as research participants: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021).
    Gleibs IH; Albayrak-Aydemir N
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Feb; 55(2):276-277. PubMed ID: 34931338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Are Debriefing Questions Used in Health Discrete Choice Experiments? An Online Survey.
    Pearce AM; Mulhern BJ; Watson V; Viney RC
    Value Health; 2020 Mar; 23(3):289-293. PubMed ID: 32197722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?
    Buhrmester M; Kwang T; Gosling SD
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 6(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26162106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Renewal and resurgence phenomena generalize to Amazon's Mechanical Turk.
    Robinson TP; Kelley ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Jan; 113(1):206-213. PubMed ID: 31965578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining day-to-day human variation in indirect calorimetry using Bayesian decision theory.
    Tenan MS; Bohannon AW; Macfarlane DJ; Crouter SE
    Exp Physiol; 2018 Dec; 103(12):1579-1585. PubMed ID: 30334310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Delay, doubt, and decision: how delaying a choice reduces the appeal of (descriptively) normative options.
    van de Ven N; Gilovich T; Zeelenberg M
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):568-73. PubMed ID: 20424103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions.
    Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Texting while driving: A discrete choice experiment.
    Foreman AM; Friedel JE; Hayashi Y; Wirth O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105823. PubMed ID: 33197793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are you for real? Maximizing participant eligibility on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.
    Kim HS; Hodgins DC
    Addiction; 2020 Oct; 115(10):1969-1971. PubMed ID: 32309892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Evaluation of Amazon's Mechanical Turk, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use.
    Buhrmester MD; Talaifar S; Gosling SD
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Mar; 13(2):149-154. PubMed ID: 29928846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk for Annotating Medical Named Entities.
    Yetisgen-Yildiz M; Solti I; Xia F
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2010; 2010():1316. PubMed ID: 21785667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The formation of preference in risky choice.
    Glickman M; Sharoni O; Levy DJ; Niebur E; Stuphorn V; Usher M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1007201. PubMed ID: 31465438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blind choice.
    Tarasenko SS; Inui T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Dec; 109(3):791-803. PubMed ID: 20178279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by rotating Scheimpflug camera, ultrasonic pachymetry, and scanning-slit corneal topography.
    Amano S; Honda N; Amano Y; Yamagami S; Miyai T; Samejima T; Ogata M; Miyata K
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jun; 113(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 16751036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.