BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33571251)

  • 1. The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.
    Ceynowa M; Zerdzicki K; Klosowski P; Zrodowski M; Pankowski R; Roclawski M; Mazurek T
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246740. PubMed ID: 33571251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Properties of composite specimens of old and new bone cement.
    Acharya A; Timperley AJ; Lee AJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jan; 225(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 21381491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?
    Li PL; Ingle PJ; Dowell JK
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):809-11. PubMed ID: 8836076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the cementing technique on the cement mantle in hip resurfacing: an in vitro computed tomography scan-based analysis.
    Scheerlinck T; Delport H; Kiewitt T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Feb; 92(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 20124065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Cnudde PH; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Timperley AJ; Mohaddes M
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drill holes decrease cancellous bone strength: A comparative study of 33 paired osteoporotic human and 9 paired artificial bone samples.
    Ceynowa M; Zerdzicki K; Klosowski P; Pankowski R; Roclawski M; Mazurek T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241143. PubMed ID: 33119661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of liner offset and inclination on cement retention strength of metal-in-metal acetabular constructs: A biomechanical study.
    Emara AK; Peterson J; Piuzzi NS; Klika A; Rajaravivarma R; Higuera-Rueda C; Roy S
    J Orthop Res; 2021 Apr; 39(4):813-820. PubMed ID: 32678920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pull-out strength of a polished tapered stem is improved by placing bone cement over the shoulder of the implant.
    Subramanian KN; Temple AJ; Evans S; John A
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 18823741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cement brand and preparation effects cement-in-cement mantle shear strength.
    Holsgrove TP; Pentlow A; Spencer RF; Miles AW
    Hip Int; 2015; 25(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 25044271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral cement extraction in revision total hip arthroplasty--an in vitro study comparing computer-assisted freehand-navigated cement removal to conventional cement extraction.
    Mumme T; Friedrich MJ; Rode H; Gravius S; Andereya S; Müller-Rath R; de la Fuente M
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Dec; 60(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 26053005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shear properties of bilaminar polymethylmethacrylate cement mantles in revision hip joint arthroplasty.
    Weinrauch PC; Bell C; Wilson L; Goss B; Lutton C; Crawford RW
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 17400096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Micromechanics of postmortem-retrieved cement-bone interfaces.
    Miller MA; Eberhardt AW; Cleary RJ; Verdonschot N; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Feb; 28(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 19658167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Temporary antibiotic-loaded cemented prosthesis for two-stage septic hip arthroplasty].
    Migaud H; Chantelot C; Besson A; Gougeon F; Dubois HH; Duquennoy A
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(5):466-8. PubMed ID: 9452800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Pitto RP; Koessler M; Kuehle JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jun; 81(6):831-43. PubMed ID: 10391548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision of cemented fixation and cement-bone interface strength.
    Rosenstein A; MacDonald W; Iliadis A; McLardy-Smith P
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1992; 206(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 1418194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Femoral cement removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. A biomechanical analysis.
    Dennis DA; Dingman CA; Meglan DA; O'Leary JF; Mallory TH; Berme N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Jul; (220):142-7. PubMed ID: 3594984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. B2 or not B2? That is the question: a review of periprosthetic fractures around cemented taper-slip femoral components.
    Maggs JL; Swanton E; Whitehouse SL; Howell JR; Timperley AJ; Hubble MJW; Wilson MJ
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jan; 103-B(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 33380191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement used in primary total hip arthroplasty.
    Cummins JS; Tomek IM; Kantor SR; Furnes O; Engesaeter LB; Finlayson SR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91(3):634-41. PubMed ID: 19255224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.