These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33571981)
21. Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers mitigate the uncertainties in proton relative biological effectiveness associated with anterior-oblique beams. Underwood TS; Voog JC; Moteabbed M; Tang S; Soffen E; Cahlon O; Lu HM; Zietman AL; Efstathiou JA; Paganetti H Acta Oncol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):575-581. PubMed ID: 28075206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy - An evaluation of dosimetric performances. Böhlen TT; Germond JF; Desorgher L; Veres I; Bratel A; Landström E; Engwall E; Herrera FG; Ozsahin EM; Bourhis J; Bochud F; Moeckli R Radiother Oncol; 2024 May; 194():110177. PubMed ID: 38378075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reducing the lateral dose penumbra in IMPT by incorporating transmission pencil beams. Kong W; Huiskes M; Habraken SJM; Astreinidou E; Rasch CRN; Heijmen BJM; Breedveld S Radiother Oncol; 2024 Sep; 198():110388. PubMed ID: 38897315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can differences in linear energy transfer and thus relative biological effectiveness compromise the dosimetric advantage of intensity-modulated proton therapy as compared to passively scattered proton therapy? Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald S; Paganetti H Acta Oncol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 29726722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization (SDDRO) of the FLASH effect for pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy. Gao H; Liu J; Lin Y; Gan GN; Pratx G; Wang F; Langen K; Bradley JD; Rotondo RL; Li HH; Chen RC Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):2014-2025. PubMed ID: 34800301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Towards FLASH proton therapy: the impact of treatment planning and machine characteristics on achievable dose rates. van de Water S; Safai S; Schippers JM; Weber DC; Lomax AJ Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1463-1469. PubMed ID: 31241377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Gu W; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 32542711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Range modulation in proton therapy planning: a simple method for mitigating effects of increased relative biological effectiveness at the end-of-range of clinical proton beams. Buchsbaum JC; McDonald MW; Johnstone PA; Hoene T; Mendonca M; Cheng CW; Das IJ; McMullen KP; Wolanski MR Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 24383792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relative Biological Effectiveness Uncertainties and Implications for Beam Arrangements and Dose Constraints in Proton Therapy. Paganetti H; Giantsoudi D Semin Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jun; 28(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 29933885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Variations in linear energy transfer within clinical proton therapy fields and the potential for biological treatment planning. Grassberger C; Trofimov A; Lomax A; Paganetti H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Aug; 80(5):1559-66. PubMed ID: 21163588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Towards proton arc therapy: physical and biologically equivalent doses with increasing number of beams in pediatric brain irradiation. Toussaint L; Indelicato DJ; Holgersen KS; Petersen JBB; Stokkevåg CH; Lassen-Ramshad Y; Casares-Magaz O; Vestergaard A; Muren LP Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1451-1456. PubMed ID: 31303090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer. Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A quantitative FLASH effectiveness model to reveal potentials and pitfalls of high dose rate proton therapy. Krieger M; van de Water S; Folkerts MM; Mazal A; Fabiano S; Bizzocchi N; Weber DC; Safai S; Lomax AJ Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):2026-2038. PubMed ID: 35032035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Exploration and application of phenomenological RBE models for proton therapy. Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Dahle TJ; Dale JE; Engeseth GM; Stokkevåg CH; Thörnqvist S; Ytre-Hauge KS Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185013. PubMed ID: 30102240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Imaging issues specific to hadrontherapy (proton, carbon, helium therapy and other charged particles) for radiotherapy planning, setup, dose monitoring and tissue response assessment. Thariat J; Hérault J; Beddok A; Feuvret L; Dauvergne D; Gérard M; Balosso J; Noël G; Valable S Cancer Radiother; 2020 Aug; 24(5):429-436. PubMed ID: 32247687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of range uncertainty on clinical distributions of linear energy transfer and biological effectiveness in proton therapy. Hahn C; Eulitz J; Peters N; Wohlfahrt P; Enghardt W; Richter C; Lühr A Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6151-6162. PubMed ID: 33118161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Proton arc reduces range uncertainty effects and improves conformality compared with photon volumetric modulated arc therapy in stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Seco J; Gu G; Marcelos T; Kooy H; Willers H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Sep; 87(1):188-94. PubMed ID: 23920395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios. Giovannini G; Böhlen T; Cabal G; Bauer J; Tessonnier T; Frey K; Debus J; Mairani A; Parodi K Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():68. PubMed ID: 27185038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility study of multiple-energy Bragg peak proton FLASH on a superconducting gantry with large momentum acceptance. Zeng Y; Li H; Wang W; Liu X; Qin B; Dai S; Pang B; Liu M; Quan H; Yang K; Chang Y; Yang Z Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2164-2174. PubMed ID: 38169535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]