These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33572237)

  • 1. Effects of Dominant and Nondominant Limb Immobilization on Muscle Activation and Physical Demand during Ambulation with Axillary Crutches.
    Bellenfant KB; Robbins GL; Rogers RR; Kopec TJ; Ballmann CG
    J Funct Morphol Kinesiol; 2021 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 33572237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Leg muscle activity during walking with assistive devices at varying levels of weight bearing.
    Clark BC; Manini TM; Ordway NR; Ploutz-Snyder LL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 85(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 15375835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Energy expenditure of ambulation using the Sure-Gait crutch and the standard axillary crutch.
    Annesley AL; Almada-Norfleet M; Arnall DA; Cornwall MW
    Phys Ther; 1990 Jan; 70(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 2294527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of energy expenditure and perceived exertion between standard axillary crutches, knee scooters, and a hands-free crutch.
    Canter DJ; Canter DJ; Reidy PT; Finucan TP; Timmerman KL
    PM R; 2024 Jun; 16(6):543-552. PubMed ID: 37950663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient Preference and Physical Demand for Hands-Free Single Crutch vs Standard Axillary Crutches in Foot and Ankle Patients.
    Martin KD; Unangst AM; Huh J; Chisholm J
    Foot Ankle Int; 2019 Oct; 40(10):1203-1208. PubMed ID: 31375043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Study of Assisted Ambulation and Perceived Exertion With the Wheeled Knee Walker and Axillary Crutches in Healthy Subjects.
    Kocher BK; Chalupa RL; Lopez DM; Kirk KL
    Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1232-1237. PubMed ID: 27521354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Ambulatory Aid on Lower-Extremity Muscle Activation During Gait.
    Sanders M; Bowden AE; Baker S; Jensen R; Nichols M; Seeley MK
    J Sport Rehabil; 2018 May; 27(3):230-236. PubMed ID: 28422559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy efficiency of ambulation-A comparison of various orthopaedic possibilities.
    Mathew J; Raja K; Baby FP; Barikkal B
    J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2018 Jul; 22(3):622-626. PubMed ID: 30100287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Lower Extremity EMG Muscle Testing With Hands-Free Single Crutch vs Standard Axillary Crutches.
    Dewar C; Martin KD
    Foot Ankle Orthop; 2020 Jul; 5(3):2473011420939875. PubMed ID: 35097398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Hip and Low Back Loads between Normal Gait, Axillary Crutch Ambulation and Walking with a Hands-free Crutch in a Healthy Population.
    Orishimo K; Shapira A; Kremenic I; McHugh M; Nicholas S
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2021; 16(6):1454-1458. PubMed ID: 34909252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crutch length: effect on energy cost and activity intensity in non-weight-bearing ambulation.
    Mullis R; Dent RM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 May; 81(5):569-72. PubMed ID: 10807093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Energy expenditure during ambulation with ortho crutches and axillary crutches.
    Hinton CA; Cullen KE
    Phys Ther; 1982 Jun; 62(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 7079293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of assistive devices on the oxygen cost, cardiovascular stress, and perception of nonweight-bearing ambulation.
    Holder CG; Haskvitz EM; Weltman A
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1993 Oct; 18(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 8220412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Axillary versus Forearm Crutches: A Prospective Cohort Comparing which is Superior for 3-Point Crutch Gait.
    Yap W; Hairodin Z; Kwek E
    Malays Orthop J; 2021 Jul; 15(2):36-42. PubMed ID: 34429820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A kinematic comparison of spring-loaded and traditional crutches.
    Seeley MK; Hunter I; Bateman T; Roggia A; Larson BJ; Draper DO
    J Sport Rehabil; 2011 May; 20(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 21576711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metabolic energy expenditure during spring-loaded crutch ambulation.
    Seeley MK; Sandberg RP; Chacon JF; Funk MD; Nokes N; Mack GW
    J Sport Rehabil; 2011 Nov; 20(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 22012496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correlation of motor control in the supine position and assistive device used for ambulation in chronic incomplete spinal cord-injured persons.
    Tang SF; Tuel SM; McKay WB; Dimitrijevic MR
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1994; 73(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 8043249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of body weight support on muscle activation during walking on a lower body positive pressure treadmill.
    Kristiansen M; Odderskær N; Kristensen DH
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2019 Oct; 48():9-16. PubMed ID: 31176846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Axillary crutch walking: effects of three training programs.
    Bhambhani YN; Clarkson HM; Gomes PS
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Jun; 71(7):484-9. PubMed ID: 2350217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some biomechanical aspects of crutch and cane walking: the relationship between forward rate of progression, symmetry, and efficiency--a case report.
    McDonough AL; Razza-Doherty M
    Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 1988 Jul; 5(3):677-93. PubMed ID: 3395953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.