311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33572249)
1. Machine Learning Algorithms for Activity-Intensity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data.
Gomes E; Bertini L; Campos WR; Sobral AP; Mocaiber I; Copetti A
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33572249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Support Vector Machine Classifiers Show High Generalizability in Automatic Fall Detection in Older Adults.
Alizadeh J; Bogdan M; Classen J; Fricke C
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Oct; 21(21):. PubMed ID: 34770473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved supervised classification of accelerometry data to distinguish behaviors of soaring birds.
Sur M; Suffredini T; Wessells SM; Bloom PH; Lanzone M; Blackshire S; Sridhar S; Katzner T
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0174785. PubMed ID: 28403159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recognition of Emotion Intensities Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Comparative Study.
Mehta D; Siddiqui MFH; Javaid AY
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Apr; 19(8):. PubMed ID: 31010081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensor-enabled Activity Class Recognition in Preschoolers: Hip versus Wrist Data.
Trost SG; Cliff DP; Ahmadi MN; Tuc NV; Hagenbuchner M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):634-641. PubMed ID: 29059107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic machine-learning based identification of jogging periods from accelerometer measurements of adolescents under field conditions.
Zdravevski E; Risteska Stojkoska B; Standl M; Schulz H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184216. PubMed ID: 28880923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft Clustering for Enhancing the Diagnosis of Chronic Diseases over Machine Learning Algorithms.
Aldhyani THH; Alshebami AS; Alzahrani MY
J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():4984967. PubMed ID: 32211144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of supervised machine learning algorithms in the classification of sagittal gait patterns of cerebral palsy children with spastic diplegia.
Zhang Y; Ma Y
Comput Biol Med; 2019 Mar; 106():33-39. PubMed ID: 30665140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Raeisi Shahraki H; Pourahmad S; Zare N
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():7560807. PubMed ID: 29376076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ensemble Methods for Classification of Physical Activities from Wrist Accelerometry.
Chowdhury AK; Tjondronegoro D; Chandran V; Trost SG
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Sep; 49(9):1965-1973. PubMed ID: 28419025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the Impact of a Two-Stage Multivariate Data Cleansing Approach to Improve to the Performance of Machine Learning Classifiers: A Case Study in Human Activity Recognition.
Neira-Rodado D; Nugent C; Cleland I; Velasquez J; Viloria A
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(7):. PubMed ID: 32230844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Study of Classification Algorithms for Various DNA Microarray Data.
Kim J; Yoon Y; Park HJ; Kim YH
Genes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 35328048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human Activity Recognition Algorithm with Physiological and Inertial Signals Fusion: Photoplethysmography, Electrodermal Activity, and Accelerometry.
Gilmore J; Nasseri M
Sensors (Basel); 2024 May; 24(10):. PubMed ID: 38793858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Machine-learning models for activity class prediction: A comparative study of feature selection and classification algorithms.
Chong J; Tjurin P; Niemelä M; Jämsä T; Farrahi V
Gait Posture; 2021 Sep; 89():45-53. PubMed ID: 34225240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feature Analysis of Smart Shoe Sensors for Classification of Gait Patterns.
Sunarya U; Sun Hariyani Y; Cho T; Roh J; Hyeong J; Sohn I; Kim S; Park C
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Nov; 20(21):. PubMed ID: 33147794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of Samsung Gear S Smartwatch for Activity Recognition: Validation Study.
Davoudi A; Wanigatunga AA; Kheirkhahan M; Corbett DB; Mendoza T; Battula M; Ranka S; Fillingim RB; Manini TM; Rashidi P
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e11270. PubMed ID: 30724739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feature Selection and Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Classification of Grazing and Rumination Behaviour in Sheep.
Mansbridge N; Mitsch J; Bollard N; Ellis K; Miguel-Pacheco GG; Dottorini T; Kaler J
Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30347653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of sensor data pre-processing strategies and selection of machine learning algorithm on the prediction of metritis events in dairy cattle.
Vidal G; Sharpnack J; Pinedo P; Tsai IC; Lee AR; Martínez-López B
Prev Vet Med; 2023 Jun; 215():105903. PubMed ID: 37028189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Free-living Evaluation of Laboratory-based Activity Classifiers in Preschoolers.
Ahmadi MN; Brookes D; Chowdhury A; Pavey T; Trost SG
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 May; 52(5):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 31764460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
