232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33573700)
1. Linkage between the intestinal microbiota and residual feed intake in broiler chickens.
Liu J; Stewart SN; Robinson K; Yang Q; Lyu W; Whitmore MA; Zhang G
J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2021 Feb; 12(1):22. PubMed ID: 33573700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring a Possible Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.
McCormack UM; Curião T; Buzoianu SG; Prieto ML; Ryan T; Varley P; Crispie F; Magowan E; Metzler-Zebeli BU; Berry D; O'Sullivan O; Cotter PD; Gardiner GE; Lawlor PG
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Aug; 83(15):. PubMed ID: 28526795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fecal Microbiota Transplant From Highly Feed Efficient Donors Affects Cecal Physiology and Microbiota in Low- and High-Feed Efficient Chickens.
Metzler-Zebeli BU; Siegerstetter SC; Magowan E; Lawlor PG; O Connell NE; Zebeli Q
Front Microbiol; 2019; 10():1576. PubMed ID: 31354670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feed Restriction Modifies Intestinal Microbiota-Host Mucosal Networking in Chickens Divergent in Residual Feed Intake.
Metzler-Zebeli BU; Siegerstetter SC; Magowan E; Lawlor PG; Petri RM; O Connell NE; Zebeli Q
mSystems; 2019; 4(1):. PubMed ID: 30701192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of feed efficiency selection on the ruminal, cecal, and fecal microbiomes of Angus steers from a commercial feedlot.
Welch CB; Lourenco JM; Davis DB; Krause TR; Carmichael MN; Rothrock MJ; Pringle TD; Callaway TR
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jul; 98(7):. PubMed ID: 32687166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feed Restriction Modulates the Fecal Microbiota Composition, Nutrient Retention, and Feed Efficiency in Chickens Divergent in Residual Feed Intake.
Siegerstetter SC; Petri RM; Magowan E; Lawlor PG; Zebeli Q; O'Connell NE; Metzler-Zebeli BU
Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():2698. PubMed ID: 30510543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of the rumen microbiota and its relationship with residual feed intake in sheep.
Zhang YK; Zhang XX; Li FD; Li C; Li GZ; Zhang DY; Song QZ; Li XL; Zhao Y; Wang WM
Animal; 2021 Mar; 15(3):100161. PubMed ID: 33785185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Joint contributions of the gut microbiota and host genetics to feed efficiency in chickens.
Wen C; Yan W; Mai C; Duan Z; Zheng J; Sun C; Yang N
Microbiome; 2021 Jun; 9(1):126. PubMed ID: 34074340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in intestinal size, structure, and function contributing to feed efficiency in broiler chickens reared at geographically distant locations.
Metzler-Zebeli BU; Magowan E; Hollmann M; Ball MEE; Molnár A; Witter K; Ertl R; Hawken RJ; Lawlor PG; O'Connell NE; Aschenbach J; Zebeli Q
Poult Sci; 2018 Feb; 97(2):578-591. PubMed ID: 29253222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intestinal microbiota profiles associated with low and high residual feed intake in chickens across two geographical locations.
Siegerstetter SC; Schmitz-Esser S; Magowan E; Wetzels SU; Zebeli Q; Lawlor PG; O'Connell NE; Metzler-Zebeli BU
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187766. PubMed ID: 29141016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porcine Feed Efficiency-Associated Intestinal Microbiota and Physiological Traits: Finding Consistent Cross-Locational Biomarkers for Residual Feed Intake.
McCormack UM; Curião T; Metzler-Zebeli BU; Magowan E; Berry DP; Reyer H; Prieto ML; Buzoianu SG; Harrison M; Rebeiz N; Crispie F; Cotter PD; O'Sullivan O; Gardiner GE; Lawlor PG
mSystems; 2019 Jun; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31213524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New insights into the associations among feed efficiency, metabolizable efficiency traits and related QTL regions in broiler chickens.
Li W; Liu R; Zheng M; Feng F; Liu D; Guo Y; Zhao G; Wen J
J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2020; 11():65. PubMed ID: 32607230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the relationship between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency in Nellore steers.
Lopes DRG; de Souza Duarte M; La Reau AJ; Chaves IZ; de Oliveira Mendes TA; Detmann E; Bento CBP; Mercadante MEZ; Bonilha SFM; Suen G; Mantovani HC
J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2021 Jul; 12(1):79. PubMed ID: 34261531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of maternal energy efficiency on broiler chicken growth, feed conversion, residual feed intake, and residual maintenance metabolizable energy requirements.
Romero LF; Zuidhof MJ; Renema RA; Naeima A; Robinson FE
Poult Sci; 2011 Dec; 90(12):2904-12. PubMed ID: 22080032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fecal Microbiota Transplant from Highly Feed-Efficient Donors Shows Little Effect on Age-Related Changes in Feed-Efficiency-Associated Fecal Microbiota from Chickens.
Siegerstetter SC; Petri RM; Magowan E; Lawlor PG; Zebeli Q; O'Connell NE; Metzler-Zebeli BU
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 84(2):. PubMed ID: 29101192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic and microbiome analysis of feed efficiency in laying hens.
Zhou Q; Lan F; Gu S; Li G; Wu G; Yan Y; Li X; Jin J; Wen C; Sun C; Yang N
Poult Sci; 2023 Apr; 102(4):102393. PubMed ID: 36805401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metagenomic insights into the relationship between intestinal flora and residual feed intake of meat ducks.
Yang C; Dong B; Chen A; Jiang Y; Bai H; Chen G; Chang G; Wang Z
Poult Sci; 2024 Jul; 103(7):103836. PubMed ID: 38776859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring Genomic Variants Related to Residual Feed Intake in Local and Commercial Chickens by Whole Genomic Resequencing.
Liu J; Liu R; Wang J; Zhang Y; Xing S; Zheng M; Cui H; Li Q; Li P; Cui X; Li W; Zhao G; Wen J
Genes (Basel); 2018 Jan; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 29364149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metagenomic insights into the relationship between gut microbiota and residual feed intake of small-sized meat ducks.
Bai H; Shi L; Guo Q; Jiang Y; Li X; Geng D; Wang C; Bi Y; Wang Z; Chen G; Xue F; Chang G
Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():1075610. PubMed ID: 36741899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small Intestine Microbiome and Metabolome of High and Low Residual Feed Intake Angus Heifers.
Liu Y; Liu C; Wu H; Meng Q; Zhou Z
Front Microbiol; 2022; 13():862151. PubMed ID: 35531283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
