These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33573833)
1. Influence of 3D-printing method, resin material, and sterilization on the accuracy of virtually designed surgical implant guides. Keßler A; Dosch M; Reymus M; Folwaczny M J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):196-204. PubMed ID: 33573833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation. Kessler A; Le V; Folwaczny M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Sep; 32(9):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 34218450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations. Le V; Keßler A; Folwaczny M Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 36625374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monomer release from surgical guide resins manufactured with different 3D printing devices. Kessler A; Reichl FX; Folwaczny M; Högg C Dent Mater; 2020 Nov; 36(11):1486-1492. PubMed ID: 32972769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used. Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 36690552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of additively manufactured and steam sterilized surgical guides by means of continuous liquid interface production, stereolithography, digital light processing, and fused filament fabrication. Burkhardt F; Handermann L; Rothlauf S; Gintaute A; Vach K; Spies BC; Lüchtenborg J J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106418. PubMed ID: 38295512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study. Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery. Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study. Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of sterilization and disinfection methods on digitally designed surgical implant guide accuracy: An in vitro study. Li R; Zhu J; Wang S; Li X; Li S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Oct; 26(5):889-898. PubMed ID: 38808751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Manufacturing Technique on the Accuracy of Surgical Guides for Static Computer-Aided Implant Surgery. Abduo J; Lau D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(5):931-938. PubMed ID: 32991643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retentive design of a small surgical guide for implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Kobe T; Fidler A; Kuralt M; Gašpirc B; Gašperšič R J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104384. PubMed ID: 36470471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of template-based guided dental implant placement-An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods. Sium-Abel A; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Bourauel C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):864-875. PubMed ID: 38629760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative assessment of the positional accuracy of dental implants inserted using computerised stackable surgical guides made using selective laser melting and digital light processing technologies for patients with maxillary terminal dentition. Hameed HA; Hebeshi A Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2023 May; 16(2):135-144. PubMed ID: 37158182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology. Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deviation of dental implants placed using a novel 3D-printed surgical guide: An in vitro study. Etajuri EA; Suliman E; Mahmood WAA; Ibrahim N; Buzayan M; Mohd NR Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(4):359-362. PubMed ID: 33448161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of guided implant surgery obtained using 3D-printed surgical guides - An in vitro comparison of four evaluation methods. Herstell H; Berndt S; Kühne C; Reich S Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Jul; 25(2):161-172. PubMed ID: 35851354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]