246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33573834)
1. Effect of different design of abutment and implant on stress distribution in 2 implants and peripheral bone: A finite element analysis study.
Kul E; Korkmaz İH
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):664.e1-664.e9. PubMed ID: 33573834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of the Type of Angled Abutment for Anterior Maxillary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Korkmaz IH; Kul E
J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 34859942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis on Stress Distribution of Internal Implant-Abutment Engagement Features.
Cho SY; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 29534119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.
Lee H; Park S; Noh G
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):659-670. PubMed ID: 30580986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution at the Internal Implant-Abutment Connection.
Cho SY; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2016; 36(3):e49-58. PubMed ID: 27100815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of different restorative crown and customized abutment materials on stress distribution in single implants and peripheral bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Kaleli N; Sarac D; Külünk S; Öztürk Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):437-445. PubMed ID: 28645667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT; Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):137.e1-137.e10. PubMed ID: 33139058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of stress distributions at the implant-abutment complex and peri-implant bone around mandibular dental implants with different neck geometries and inclinations.
Dinc MM; Turkoglu P; Selvi F
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Sep; 235(9):1035-1045. PubMed ID: 34098780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of tightening torque on screw stress and formation of implant-abutment microgaps: A finite element analysis.
Honório Tonin BS; He Y; Ye N; Chew HP; Fok A
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):882-889. PubMed ID: 33472752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load.
Uppalapati V; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Bhat I; Munaganti J; Khan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 37189007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of shoulder coverage difference of abutment on stress distribution and screw stability in tissue-level internal connection implants: A finite element analysis and in vitro study.
Lee HY; Yang SW; Kang YJ; Oh KC; Kim JH
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):682.e1-682.e10. PubMed ID: 33551133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Stress Distribution and Deformation of Four Prosthetic Materials in Full-mouth Rehabilitation with Implants: A Three-dimensional Finite Element Study.
Chand YB; Mahendra J; Jigeesh N; Mahendra L; Shivasubramanian L; Perika SB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 33850065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation.
Chu CM; Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
