129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33573971)
1. The levels of artificial insemination and missing sire information make genomic selection not always beneficial in meat sheep.
Raoul J; Elsen JM
Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100040. PubMed ID: 33573971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Potential benefits of genomic selection on genetic gain of small ruminant breeding programs.
Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Elsen JM
J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3644-57. PubMed ID: 23736059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of genomic breeding values for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in a multi-breed sheep population using a HD SNP chip.
Brito LF; Clarke SM; McEwan JC; Miller SP; Pickering NK; Bain WE; Dodds KG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 28122512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using a very low-density SNP panel for genomic selection in a breeding program for sheep.
Raoul J; Swan AA; Elsen JM
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Oct; 49(1):76. PubMed ID: 29065868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genotyping strategies of selection candidates in livestock breeding programmes.
Granleese T; Clark SA; van der Werf JHJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 30690805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Invited review: Genomic selection for small ruminants in developed countries: how applicable for the rest of the world?
Mrode R; Tarekegn GM; Mwacharo JM; Djikeng A
Animal; 2018 Jul; 12(7):1333-1340. PubMed ID: 29343308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing female allocation to reproductive technologies considering merit, inbreeding and cost in nucleus breeding programmes with genomic selection.
Granleese T; Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; van der Werf JHJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 30585664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing the design of small-sized nucleus breeding programs for dairy cattle with minimal performance recording.
Kariuki CM; Komen H; Kahi AK; van Arendonk JA
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7963-74. PubMed ID: 25282422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values.
Granleese T; Clark SA; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):70. PubMed ID: 26370143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic and economic effects of the increase in female paternal filiations by parentage assignment in sheep and goat breeding programs.
Raoul J; Palhière I; Astruc JM; Elsen JM
J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3663-3683. PubMed ID: 27898915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic selection strategies to improve maternal traits in Norwegian White Sheep.
Lillehammer M; Sonesson AK; Klemetsdal G; Blichfeldt T; Meuwissen THE
J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Jul; 137(4):384-394. PubMed ID: 32236991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a SNP panel dedicated to parentage assignment in French sheep populations.
Tortereau F; Moreno CR; Tosser-Klopp G; Servin B; Raoul J
BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 28549462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perspectives for artificial insemination and genomics to improve global swine populations.
Gerrits RJ; Lunney JK; Johnson LA; Pursel VG; Kraeling RR; Rohrer GA; Dobrinsky JR
Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):283-99. PubMed ID: 15626400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short communication: Field fertility in Holstein bulls: Can type of breeding strategy (artificial insemination following estrus versus timed artificial insemination) alter service sire fertility?
Batista EOS; Vieira LM; Sá Filho MF; Carvalho PD; Rivera H; Cabrera V; Wiltbank MC; Baruselli PS; Souza AH
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2010-2015. PubMed ID: 26778314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
König S; Swalve HH
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing genetic gain, inbreeding, and bias attributable to different flock genetic means in alternative sheep sire referencing schemes.
Kuehn LA; Notter DR; Lewis RM
J Anim Sci; 2008 Mar; 86(3):526-35. PubMed ID: 18073281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review: Genomics of bull fertility.
Taylor JF; Schnabel RD; Sutovsky P
Animal; 2018 Jun; 12(s1):s172-s183. PubMed ID: 29618393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
Robinson JA; Buhr MM
Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of genomic selection of AI dairy sires on their likely utilization and methods to estimate fertility: a paradigm shift.
Amann RP; DeJarnette JM
Theriogenology; 2012 Mar; 77(5):795-817. PubMed ID: 22153268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
