These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33575987)

  • 1. Accurate models vs. accurate estimates: A simulation study of Bayesian single-case experimental designs.
    Natesan Batley P; Hedges LV
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1782-1798. PubMed ID: 33575987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating immediacy in multiple-phase-change single-case experimental designs using a Bayesian unknown change-points model.
    Natesan Batley P; Minka T; Hedges LV
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1714-1728. PubMed ID: 32103466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the Bayesian Unknown Change-Point Model and Simulation Modeling Analysis to Analyze Single Case Experimental Designs.
    Natesan Batley P; Nandakumar R; Palka JM; Shrestha P
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():617047. PubMed ID: 33519641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian analysis of single case experimental design count data in trauma research: A tutorial.
    Natesan Batley P
    Psychol Trauma; 2023 Jul; 15(5):829-837. PubMed ID: 36455884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian estimates of autocorrelations in single-case designs.
    Shadish WR; Rindskopf DM; Hedges LV; Sullivan KJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):813-21. PubMed ID: 23239070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
    Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian Time-Series Models in Single Case Experimental Designs: A Tutorial for Trauma Researchers.
    Natesan Batley P; Contractor AA; Caldas SV
    J Trauma Stress; 2020 Dec; 33(6):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 33205545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian Approach for Summarizing and Modeling Time-Series Exposure Data with Left Censoring.
    Houseman EA; Virji MA
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Aug; 61(7):773-783. PubMed ID: 28810680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More stable estimation of the STARTS model: A Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.
    Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A; Wagner J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):570-593. PubMed ID: 29172612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of informative priors skeptical of large treatment effects in clinical trials: A simulation study.
    Pedroza C; Han W; Truong VTT; Green C; Tyson JE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 26668090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dealing with missing data by EM in single-case studies.
    Chen LT; Feng Y; Wu PJ; Peng CJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):131-150. PubMed ID: 30805863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS.
    Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2401-28. PubMed ID: 16015676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study.
    Pedroza C; Truong VTT
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):512. PubMed ID: 29096682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
    Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of globally obtained informative priors on bayesian safety performance functions developed for Australian crash data.
    Afghari AP; Haque MM; Washington S; Smyth T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():55-65. PubMed ID: 31108237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of the Within- and Between-Series Estimators to Non-normal Multiple-Baseline Data: Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Approaches.
    Joo SH; Ferron JM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(5):666-689. PubMed ID: 30857444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal mediation effects in single case experimental designs.
    Valente MJ; Rijnhart JJM; Miočević M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Apr; 28(2):488-506. PubMed ID: 35549318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias properties of Bayesian statistics in finite mixture of negative binomial regression models in crash data analysis.
    Park BJ; Lord D; Hart JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):741-9. PubMed ID: 20159102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian unknown change-point models to investigate immediacy in single case designs.
    Natesan P; Hedges LV
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):743-759. PubMed ID: 28406673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comprehensive method of single-case data analysis: Interrupted Time-Series Simulation (ITSSIM).
    Tarlow KR; Brossart DF
    Sch Psychol Q; 2018 Dec; 33(4):590-603. PubMed ID: 30284889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.