These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33576292)

  • 1. Incidence, predictors, and economic burden of circular anastomotic complications in left-sided colorectal reconstructions involving manual circular staplers.
    Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Chaudhuri R; Fryrear R; Roy S
    J Med Econ; 2021; 24(1):255-265. PubMed ID: 33576292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Pérez-Santiago L; Barrachina-Martinez I; González-de-Julián S; Vivas-Consuelo D; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2024 Jul; 28(1):76. PubMed ID: 38954099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Indirect comparison between powered and manual circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomoses: clinical and economic outcomes in China.
    Bai J; Zhao Y; Liang H; Li J; Zhang C
    Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2022 Aug; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 36045434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.
    Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of economic and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with powered versus manual endoscopic surgical staplers.
    Roy S; Yoo A; Yadalam S; Fegelman EJ; Kalsekar I; Johnston SS
    J Med Econ; 2017 Apr; 20(4):423-433. PubMed ID: 28270023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic Analysis of Leak Complications in Anastomoses Performed with Powered versus Manual Circular Staplers in Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A US-Based Cost Analysis.
    Pollack E; Johnston S; Petraiuolo WJ; Roy S; Galvain T
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2021; 13():531-540. PubMed ID: 34168470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Powered and Tissue-Specific Endoscopic Stapling Technology on Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy Procedures: A Retrospective, Observational Study.
    Miller DL; Roy S; Kassis ES; Yadalam S; Ramisetti S; Johnston SS
    Adv Ther; 2018 May; 35(5):707-723. PubMed ID: 29663180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the impact of EEA stapler size on risk of anastomotic complications in colorectal anastomosis: does size matter?
    Reif de Paula T; Simon H; Shah M; Lee-Kong S; Kiely JM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Apr; 24(4):283-290. PubMed ID: 32036461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.
    Herzig DO; Ogilvie JW; Chudzinski A; Ferrara A; Ashraf SQ; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Van der Speeten K; Kinross J; Schimmelpenning H; Sagar PM; Cannon JA; Schwiers ML; Singleton DW; Waggoner JR; Fryrear R; Sylla P
    Int J Surg; 2020 Dec; 84():140-146. PubMed ID: 33176211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of circular stapler size on anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery: A propensity score matched study.
    Lee KY; Lee J; Park YY; Kim HJ; Oh ST
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287595. PubMed ID: 37903104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the circular compression stapler and circular mechanical stapler in the end-to-side transanal colorectal anastomosis after left colon and rectal resections A single center experience.
    Pironi D; Vendettuoli M; Pontone S; Panarese A; Arcieri S; Filippini A; Grimaldi G
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():23-30. PubMed ID: 27025236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dual-perspective analysis of the hospital and payer-borne burdens of selected in-hospital surgical complications in low anterior resection for colorectal cancer.
    Ammann EM; Goldstein LJ; Nagle D; Wei D; Johnston SS
    Hosp Pract (1995); 2019 Apr; 47(2):80-87. PubMed ID: 30632418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis.
    Atallah S; Kural S; Banda N; Banda A; Bawaney F; Cabral F; Neychev V; Patel C; Larach S
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 May; 24(5):479-486. PubMed ID: 32193667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of Complications with Healthcare Utilization and Hospital-Borne Costs Among Patients Undergoing Open Low Anterior Resection Using Curved Cutter Staplers.
    Rai P; Johnston SS; Chaudhuri R; Naoumtchik E; Pollack E
    Med Devices (Auckl); 2021; 14():87-95. PubMed ID: 33833593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.