115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33576699)
1. Women's perspectives on smartphone apps for fertility tracking and predicting conception: a mixed methods study.
Blair DL; Morgan HM; McLernon DJ
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2021 Apr; 26(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 33576699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mixed methods exploratory study of women's relationships with and uses of fertility tracking apps.
Gambier-Ross K; McLernon DJ; Morgan HM
Digit Health; 2018; 4():2055207618785077. PubMed ID: 30225095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fertility app for two? Women's perspectives on sharing conceptive fertility work with male partners.
Hamper J
Cult Health Sex; 2022 Dec; 24(12):1713-1728. PubMed ID: 34779718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fertility and digital technology: narratives of using smartphone app 'Natural Cycles' while trying to conceive.
Grenfell P; Tilouche N; Shawe J; French RS
Sociol Health Illn; 2021 Jan; 43(1):116-132. PubMed ID: 33147647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fecundability in relation to use of mobile computing apps to track the menstrual cycle.
Stanford JB; Willis SK; Hatch EE; Rothman KJ; Wise LA
Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2245-2252. PubMed ID: 32910202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Critical Appraisal of Fertility and Menstrual Tracking Apps for the iPhone.
Zwingerman R; Chaikof M; Jones C
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 May; 42(5):583-590. PubMed ID: 31882289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Mobile Applications Intended to Aid in Conception Using a Systematic Review Framework.
Hutcherson TC; Cieri-Hutcherson NE; Donnelly PJ; Feneziani ML; Grisanti KMR
Ann Pharmacother; 2020 Feb; 54(2):178-186. PubMed ID: 31510755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Age shock: misperceptions of the impact of age on fertility before and after IVF in women who conceived after age 40.
Mac Dougall K; Beyene Y; Nachtigall RD
Hum Reprod; 2013 Feb; 28(2):350-6. PubMed ID: 23203214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do fertility tracking applications offer women useful information about their fertile window?
Ali R; Gürtin ZB; Harper JC
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 34756400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The association between reproductive health smartphone applications and fertility knowledge of Australian women.
Ford EA; Roman SD; McLaughlin EA; Beckett EL; Sutherland JM
BMC Womens Health; 2020 Mar; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 32131809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of leveraging menstrual cycle tracking apps for preconception research recruitment.
Jukic AMZ; Jahnke HR; MacNell N; Bradley D; Malloy SM; Baird DD
Front Reprod Health; 2022; 4():981878. PubMed ID: 36303662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fertility Knowledge Among Women Struggling to Conceive Without Medical Intervention: A Brief Report.
Halleran M; Chernoff A; Gordon JL
Front Glob Womens Health; 2022; 3():828052. PubMed ID: 35224546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's experiences of ovulation testing: a qualitative analysis.
Jones G; Carlton J; Weddell S; Johnson S; Ledger WL
Reprod Health; 2015 Dec; 12():116. PubMed ID: 26689590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. User profile and preferences in fertility apps for preventing pregnancy: an exploratory pilot study.
Starling MS; Kandel Z; Haile L; Simmons RG
Mhealth; 2018; 4():21. PubMed ID: 30050917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of Fertility-Awareness-Based Method Use Among Women Trying to Conceive and Women Contemplating Pregnancy.
Pérez Capotosto M; Lee CS; Jurgens CY; Wang S; Mitsunami M; Charlton BM; Chavarro JE
Nurs Res; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 72(5):355-362. PubMed ID: 37625177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding conception and fertility: a population-based survey among reproductive-age United States women.
Lundsberg LS; Pal L; Gariepy AM; Xu X; Chu MC; Illuzzi JL
Fertil Steril; 2014 Mar; 101(3):767-74. PubMed ID: 24484995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Technologies of time: women's practices of trying to conceive with ovulation biosensing.
Wilkinson J
Sociol Health Illn; 2020 Sep; 42(7):1597-1610. PubMed ID: 32609396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of knowledge and perceived susceptibility in intentions to optimize fertility: findings from the International Fertility Decision-Making Study (IFDMS).
Fulford B; Bunting L; Tsibulsky I; Boivin J
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3253-62. PubMed ID: 24105825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of perception of ovulation day in women trying to conceive.
Zinaman M; Johnson S; Ellis J; Ledger W
Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 May; 28(5):749-54. PubMed ID: 22462529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient experiences of fertility clinic closure during the COVID-19 pandemic: appraisals, coping and emotions.
Boivin J; Harrison C; Mathur R; Burns G; Pericleous-Smith A; Gameiro S
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2556-2566. PubMed ID: 32761248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
